• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 months ago

      They also can’t attack assets inside Russia without using Russian airspace. Russian airspace is equally complicit.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 months ago

        What about Russian sunlight, moonlight or clouds? Are those complicit as well? This is an important question, pls respond!

    • @ThePyroPython
      link
      English
      322 months ago

      If I can’t navigate to your house without GPS does that mean when I arrive NATO is fucking your mother?

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      Can somebody explain why this was removed? It didn’t break any rules, “Russian cope” isn’t prohibited by the rules. Just trying to understand the logic. How does deleting controversial opinions (that aren’t hate speech or call for violence) help anyone?

      Side note, I just realized that Rule 5. says “no politics”. How is this even possible? 80% of content here is politics in some shape or form, just like this post.

      • nukeM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Rule 2 Russian propaganda is factually incorrect. All factually incorrect information that isn’t obviously satire should have matching citations explaining why it’s incorrect.

        Rule 4 Russian propaganda is hatespeech.

        Rule 5 No politics.

        I don’t pretend to be unbiased or neutral. If what you want is a rule that says don’t suck Russian cock by propagating the talking points of war criminals, I’ll be glad to add it.

        How does deleting controversial opinions (that aren’t hate speech or call for violence) help anyone?

        If you came to a defense shitposting community looking for help you may have come to the wrong place.

          • nukeM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 months ago

            Trying to sell the lie that NATO is at war with Russia is literally Russian MOD talking points.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -12 months ago

              Yes, agreed. That doesn’t make it hate speech. You undermine the concept of hate speech when you abuse it like this.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                92 months ago

                Doesn’t need to be hate speech for it to be removed.

                Russian shills just aren’t welcome here. They can fuck off to their motherland until their imperial sock puppet of a dictator stops invading sovereign nations.

              • nukeM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 months ago

                Then we should add a new rule that better encompasses the intent such as “No misinformation”.

          • nukeM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Expecting people not to spread the Russian MoD lies is too much to ask apparently.

            edit: toned it down

      • @spookex
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        It’s not? I can see it on my phone just fine