• @blazera
    link
    English
    -52 months ago

    This is just a long page of comments on this post on my end.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      52 months ago

      It’s a link to an article titled ‘Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot’.

      • @blazera
        link
        English
        -52 months ago

        Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

        But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

        Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          32 months ago

          I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

          Actually this is what I’m arguing.

          It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

          • @blazera
            link
            English
            -42 months ago

            Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.

              • @blazera
                link
                English
                -42 months ago

                Right, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS

                  • @blazera
                    link
                    English
                    -42 months ago

                    A state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.