• SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    52 months ago

    It’s a link to an article titled ‘Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot’.

    • @blazera
      link
      English
      -52 months ago

      Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

      But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

      Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        32 months ago

        I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

        Actually this is what I’m arguing.

        It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

        • @blazera
          link
          English
          -42 months ago

          Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.

            • @blazera
              link
              English
              -42 months ago

              Right, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS

                • @blazera
                  link
                  English
                  -42 months ago

                  A state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                    link
                    42 months ago

                    Can you try this comment again because I’m not picking up what you’re putting down.