• @Zachariah
    link
    612 days ago

    Republicans on Tuesday blocked a bill that would have created a right to access in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments and mandated that insurance plans cover the practice, deriding the vote as a political ploy.

    Senators voted against advancing the bill, 51-44, marking the second time Democrats have sought to put Republicans on the record on the contentious issue. Sixty votes were needed to open debate on the measure.

    Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) voted with every Democrat and independent.

    Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) did not vote.

    GOP senators derided the Democratic legislation, authored by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), as nothing more than a show vote, accusing Democrats of misrepresenting Republicans’ views on IVF.

    Ahead of the vote, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) tried to pass via voice vote a competing bill he and Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) introduced earlier this year that would withhold Medicaid funding from states that ban IVF, but it was blocked by Democrats.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      552 days ago

      GOP senators derided the Democratic legislation, authored by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), as nothing more than a show vote

      …and so the GOP decided to show their disdain for reproductive rights.

    • @jumjummy
      link
      232 days ago

      Fuck anyone who complains about the “Democrats not getting anything done” when these literal obstructionist GOP politicians have blocked any progress. Absolutely need a complete Blue wave for President, House, and Senate to get actual progress done.

    • @NocturnalMorning
      link
      92 days ago

      that would withhold Medicaid funding from states that ban IVF, but it was blocked by Democrats.

      Withholding Medicaid funding doesn’t seem like a great idea. But on the whole being against banning IVF seems like a good idea. Am I missing something?

      • partial_accumen
        link
        292 days ago

        that would withhold Medicaid funding from states that ban IVF, but it was blocked by Democrats.

        Withholding Medicaid funding doesn’t seem like a great idea. But on the whole being against banning IVF seems like a good idea. Am I missing something?

        Republicans don’t want to secure IVF and don’t want to pay for Medicaid. GOP state’s would happily block IVF to get Medicaid defunded.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          72 days ago

          they want to turn their states into shitholes, and a few have succeeded in that. I’m all for the brain drain that’ll happen. especially if those funds got diverted to blue states.

        • @NocturnalMorning
          link
          21 day ago

          I’m aware of their issues with reproduction e rights. But that’s not what that statement says.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            11 day ago

            But that’s not what that statement says.

            I read the OP again. I read your statement again. I’m not seeing a different meaning than the one I came away with and commented on originally.

            What are you saying the statement says that my comments contradict?

            • @NocturnalMorning
              link
              221 hours ago

              The statement said withhold Medicaid for states banning IVF. Aka if you ban IVF, the bill would punish the state by withholding Medicaid. Seems to be the opposite of what Republicans want with IVF.