Premier Danielle Smith says she plans to reinforce the right to decide whether to receive a vaccination or other medical procedure in changes to the Alberta Bill of Rights.

In an online video posted Tuesday, Smith said her government aims to amend the document in a few weeks to ensure people have the right to make informed decisions without fear of undue pressure or interference by the government.

“It is my firm conviction that no Albertan should ever be subjected (to) or pressured into accepting a medical treatment without their full consent,” she said.

The changes outlined by Smith would also ensure the province respects “the right of individuals to legally acquire, keep and safely use firearms.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3318 hours ago

    No comments on what this would do to Alberta’s already failing health are system as people refuse vaccinations for deadly diseases om the basis that a random internet stranger said they should? No?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2717 hours ago

      They looked at USA’s ongoing dumpster fire to the south and said “that looks nice and warm.”

      • @T00l_shed
        link
        2116 hours ago

        Conservatives are a plague

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1116 hours ago

        Conservatives have adopted the franchise model and applied it to politics. They conform themselves to head office (in this case Republicans in the US) and get to piggy back off the propaganda that gets put out by them. The US being the media powerhouse that it is, it’s pretty effective. Alberta is the most obvious example of this.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          611 hours ago

          The first PM to do this was Mulroney with Reagan (and his -nomics bs that’s led us to this hellscape).

          If we had been smarter back then we never would have elected that idjit in the first place. All he did was follow Reagan around like a lap dog.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -714 hours ago

      I’m hoping it’s just political grand-standing fluff and no (further) damage to the health system. You can already refuse vaccines.

      That said, employers requiring vaccination as condition of employment outside of some select sectors during COVID did feel like a line was crossed

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        10
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I’m very libertarian (like the political stance, not the party) but even I don’t see a problem with an employer requiring a vaccination. Every site I work at requires people to be vaccinated against Covid among other things. Why would my employer not require the vaccination?

        As a plus, it let us prune a couple of antivax idiots from our ranks.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          612 hours ago

          Fundamentally, the only people against this simply don’t believe in covid. You don’t see them crying on the internet about employers not letting people work on construction sites without hard hats - it’s basic safety. As long as you accept that covid is dangerous, then you have no issue with employers requiring a vaccination.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 hours ago

            I basically agree, the only difference is that it’s something you put into your body with potential side effects (extremely rare of course) which feels like it’s crossing a different line than PPE.

            Combine that with many employers never requiring other vaccines before but adding the COVID vaccine as a requirement for employment not just for new hires but people already employed and I think it was just a bit too far. Maybe if people had the option of really masking up or something instead and they refused that too would I feel better about it.

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m like triple or quadruple vaccinated for COVID at this point, but that’s because I felt it was the best course of action. I would’ve not been a fan of my employer requiring it even though it’s something I was going to do anyway.

          • Em Adespoton
            link
            fedilink
            211 hours ago

            It’s the same type of people who were against seatbelt regulations in the 1970s and helmet laws for motorcycles and bicycles later on.

            People who only want to live in a society when the benefit to them is immediately obvious.