• @portuga
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Didn’t watch the movie, probably why it went over my head. Sorry 🤷‍♂️

    • @niktemadur
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      No Oppenheimer?!!
      Your geek credentials are hereby revoked until further notice!
      Or until you atone!

        • @niktemadur
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s a movie about physics, with characters like Niels Bohr featured prominently, which just so happened to be made for general audiences and it was a hit, by a director whose other historical film was about Dunkirk.

          Before these movies were made, the subjects were pretty much obscure to the mainstream. Films like these are regarded as risky for large studios, and it’s widely acknowledged that Christopher Nolan is on the very short list of directors with the blessing to do absolutely whatever they want at large studio scale and budget and that is not part of a franchise. And by “very short list” I mean people like Stanley Kubrick.

          The “mainstream” label on Oppenheimer is incidental, after the fact.

          • @portuga
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            I would watch an edit of the movie that only featured the physics part of it. It’s the boring part I don’t have time for

      • @portuga
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Subject matter doesn’t appeal to me much, and I’m also not very fond of the lead actor (no particular reason, he’s a great actor) If it serves as consolation I only watched like 15min of barbie, either

        • @Ziglin
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          I didn’t make it through 5min of Barbie lol

          Oppenheimer was good and had nice music too.