Just curious because I don’t see people talk about it a lot.

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 months ago

    Atsc 3.0 requires an internet connection for it’s bullshit DRM

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      143 months ago

      Woww, over the air broadcasts with copy protection? 🤮

    • Kushan
      link
      English
      73 months ago

      That seems entirely pointless then, why not just stream the content.

      • @Ptsf
        link
        23 months ago

        Bandwidth is cheaper from the tower since the signal is the “same” for each client and it can then be distributed over a wide area. You send the “DRM” (Just a fancy encryption key) over the network since it’s relatively small and likely unique to each device (probably fingerprinting the device ids to the content invisibily in case of piracy).

        • Kushan
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          Multicast is a thing, though it doesn’t seem to be widespread. That would make a lot more sense than this weird DRM broadcast system.

          • @Ptsf
            link
            23 months ago

            Multicast still requires more expensive less widespread bandwidth than sending out analog signals ota & shooting off a few packets of encryption information every now and then. US infrastructure has rapidly improved over the past few years, but we’re still a farcry from anything robust and reliable enough to serve the people benefiting from this type of content.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Having the receiver phone home would have the benefit of generating more accurate viewership data, where broadcast tv has historically relied on representative cohorts.