Some just want to promote conflict, cause chaos, or even just get attention.

Some just want to promote conflict, cause chaos, or even just get attention.

There has been a lot of research on the types of people who believe conspiracy theories, and their reasons for doing so. But there’s a wrinkle: My colleagues and I have found that there are a number of people sharing conspiracies online who don’t believe their own content.

They are opportunists. These people share conspiracy theories to promote conflict, cause chaos, recruit and radicalize potential followers, make money, harass, or even just to get attention.

There are several types of this sort of conspiracy-spreader trying to influence you.

    • @[email protected]
      17•3 months ago

      If I pump put baseless conspiracies nonstop then statistically I’ll get something sort of right at some point. It doesn’t mean I was right to espouse that bullshit on the first place. Showing your work matters. If you got to a right conclusion accidentally by making shit up , it doesn’t mean you were “right” or that people were we’re wrong to laugh at you. There’s a thing called Epistemology. Humans have been doing it for thousands of years. Learn about it .

      • sunzu2
        -11•3 months ago

        So you hold your regime to the similar standard?

        • @[email protected]
          11•3 months ago

          Can you ask a coherent question? Who is my regime? You’re not being charged by the word. Be specific.

          • sunzu2
            -3•3 months ago

            Owners of the US have fake news run propaganda that has no basis in fact. Do you hold these people as accountable the same way you are doing here with some random Neo nazis farming twattrr for cash?

            • @[email protected]
              11•3 months ago

              Owners of the US have fake news run propaganda that has no basis in fact.

              Generalizing this far is not rational or productive. There are varying degrees of quality in US media with varying problems within. Zooming out this far isn’t productive. Might as well go further and say “people lie, therefore nothing can be trusted”. Sounds deep, but is just a futile meaningless statement. Most problems with news media stem from distortions of fact, but obviously do have some basis in fact so right off the bat your premise is faulty.

              Do you hold these people as accountable

              If you’re asking whether I hold media accountable for lying or for bad reporting (no, they are the same. If you can tell the difference that’s on you), then yes I do.

              You’re now far off topic. Spreading baseless conspiracy theories constantly and having some of them be sort of adjacent to the truth isn’t a vindication. It doesnt mean you were right to say what you said.

                • @[email protected]
                  9•3 months ago

                  You guys always prove to be completely incapable of rational thought. It’s why the article triggered you so much.

                  • sunzu2
                    -5•3 months ago

                    i explained my position. you offered nothing to rebut tbh

    • @SassyRamen
      5•3 months ago

      You’re talking about Fox “News” right?

      • sunzu2
        -6•3 months ago

        All of it… Regime whores doing owners bidding and normies larp as gospel and do so as narrative shifts.

    • @barsquid
      3•3 months ago

      What are the conspiracies that turned out to be true?