• WatDabney
    link
    fedilink
    8110 hours ago

    There is zero chance that there is not going to be fairly significant violence from Trump’s supporters between November and January.

    It will happen, absolutely no matter what.

    Either he’s going to lose, in which case they’re going to engage in retaliatory and/or insurrectionary violence, or he’s going to win (or be handed the win by the Supreme Court Rubber-stamping Service), in which case they’re going to engage in celebratory, very enthusiastic and likely officially sanctioned violence.

    That’s it. At this point, there is no third option. Trump, in his pathological narcissism and complete lack of empathy or sound reason, has fostered an atmosphere of anger and hatred, and it’s not a question of if it will result in violence and murder, but simply of when and of what specifically will touch it off.

    • @Num10ck
      link
      English
      128 hours ago

      Third Option: Trump dies this year, and again violence.

        • Bizzle
          link
          English
          26 hours ago

          Trump has (Jodie Foster)ed hate and division

    • @kmartburrito
      link
      4010 hours ago

      At least trump isn’t the incumbent this time, Biden can let the National Guard deal with them. FAFO

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 hours ago

      or he’s going to win (or be handed the win by the Supreme Court Rubber-stamping Service),

      I agree with your comment in general and apologize for what may sound like a bit of a flippant reply, but I actually think what would worry me the most is if it it goes to SCOTUS and they somehow do NOT install Trump. I think the super-faithful deep-state-believers would lose their effing minds at that turn of events - this is where I would expect to see the violence ramping up the fastest.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        127 hours ago

        No. That’s a way better option than a fascist dictator actually gaining power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 hours ago

          Oh for sure, and I wasn’t suggesting otherwise.

          I expect a more immediate and flagrant violent event in that case vs the other two though.

      • WatDabney
        link
        fedilink
        25 hours ago

        Unfortunately, there’s likely some truth to that. In spite of the SC fairly consistently destroying the rule of law to rule on Trump’s behalf, if even one time they rule against him, even on just one ruling that’s so vividly obvious that the otherwise wholly corrupt and compromised SC can’t possibly cobble together an excuse to rule in Trump’s favor, that really is likely to touch off more violence quicker than just about anything else.