GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

  • @danc4498
    link
    English
    379 hours ago

    Class action lawsuits are gonna be a mother fucker

    • partial_accumen
      link
      English
      568 hours ago

      Class action lawsuits are gonna be a mother fucker

      Part of the purchase agreement of a Tesla agreeing to binding arbitration. This means no class action suit. You can opt out of this within the first 30 days, but you have to send a letter requesting it.

      How many Tesla owners do you think do that?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        318 hours ago

        That assumes the court finds that enforceable. Usually they do, but a few times recently, they’ve said it’s not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          398 hours ago

          That’s one of the nice things about the law in Quebec. Binding arbitration clauses are illegal.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Je devrais demeneger a Montreal.

              • @grue
                link
                English
                16 hours ago

                Whoops, I really meant “devrais.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 hours ago

          I mean in trumps court of law musk can’t lose.

          If dumpy wins, for sure no class action.

          If dumpy loses, his Supreme Court will still side with the conservative side anyway, so probably still no class action.

      • bluGill
        link
        fedilink
        187 hours ago

        i don’t own a tesla, so if their cars injure me I can sue them*

      • @Serinus
        link
        English
        86 hours ago

        Steam recently removed their arbitration clause, largely because paying for a thousand arbitration cases is worse than dealing with a class action.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 hours ago

          I’ve heard that death by 1,000 arbitrations is a good way to make em regret it. Glad to see it’s true.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        26 hours ago

        Wow, I never thought I’d find an actual good argument for keeping independent car dealers as middlemen instead of allowing first-party sales, but here we are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 hours ago

          Can you connect the dots for me? Third party dealers always have idemnity? clauses anyways.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            15 hours ago

            Presumably anything you’d agree to while buying from an independent dealer would be between you and the dealer, not you and the manufacturer, right? I don’t understand how the manufacturer would be a party to the transaction.

            (It might be that I’m naive about how modern car sales work.)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 hours ago

              I’m pretty clueless too, but to me your assertion doesn’t hold up to the concept of recalls.

              The true answer is probably that we’re both wrong and the answer is that as a consumer: you lose, fuck you. Also fuck your family dog.

      • @JiveTurkey
        link
        English
        17 hours ago

        This didn’t work for valve so I can see it also going poorly for Tesla.