@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoCheekymander.xyzimagemessage-square226fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageCheekymander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square226fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoMy teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia. I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoI think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoand they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites
My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.
I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia
It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
and they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites