• @iAvicenna
    link
    English
    251 month ago

    some papers are almost like they are trying to keep the core idea a secret

    • @InputZero
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately there’s a bit of pressure to osbficate the core idea of a publication in academia. While the ideal academics try to hold themselves to is to freely exchange information, for researchers who are paid to study very neiche topics there’s an insensitive to put some resistance into others entering their field. There is only so much funding and one more team means more competition. So some researchers who find themselves in that position will intentionally complicate their published work as a way to create a disincentive to others from crowding their field. It sucks but the reality is that funding and money come before the faithful pursuit of knowledge.

      Also, some people just suck at writing.

        • Kallioapina
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Bad grammar nazi, there are several other typos! Bad!

          • @Madison420
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            I just catch the ones the news with my dyslexia.

        • @dejected_warp_core
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          As a (perhaps unintentional) slip, “an insensitive” works rather well here. Gatekeeping your field in a forum of open(ish)1 information exchange is just categorically “not nice”.

          Personally, I would have opted for a portmanteau like “incentsitive”.


          1 - Paywalls notwithstanding.

          • @Madison420
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            It doesn’t fit in context, they clearly meant incentive.