• kersploosh
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    In some places that is a strategy to satisfy zoning requirements. The builder has to provide a minimum amount of outdoor area per dwelling unit. They could create a large ground-level courtyard, or they can create a bunch of tiny balconies that sum up to the same total area. The ladder latter strategy allows a larger building to exist on the same lot.

    Edit: Stupid voice-to-text always gets me.

    • kamenLady.
      link
      2315 hours ago

      I approve of the ladder strategy. Work those legs!

    • @halcyoncmdr
      link
      English
      1015 hours ago

      A different design other than a basic box would allow them to make a large outdoor area at basically any level they want, not necessarily the ground, but that’s of course more expensive as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        814 hours ago

        I think people value private outdoor space differently than public outdoor space. I don’t actually have a balcony but I think I would usually prefer a private space to a public one, even if the public one was much nicer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          614 hours ago

          It helps a lot if the balcony is somewhat enclosed. The balconies that are just iron fences with no privacy at all are basically useless.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        214 hours ago

        so like, even if it were a box…

        They don’t really have to encase each floor. most buildings are concrete, and they could just as easily seal that floor off and leave the observation platform open. But the reality is that it gets pretty windy up that high, and most people won’t want to be out there for very long at all. And not at all if it’s at all inclement.

        not to mention… jumpers.