• @psycho_driver
    link
    English
    3117 hours ago

    How can we know the over-arching theme and conclusion of this paper without seeing it in it’s entirety?

    • @uservoid1
      link
      English
      47
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      You can read it here https://www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Journal_of_Advanced_Computer_Technology

      In 2005, two scientists, David Mazières and Eddie Kohler, wrote a paper titled Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List and submitted it to WMSCI 2005 (the 9th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics), in protest of the conference’s notoriety for its spamming and lax standards for paper acceptance. The paper consisted essentially only of the sentence “Get me off your fucking mailing list” repeated many times, sometimes as illustrations or diagrams.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2116 hours ago

        And how did it end? Was it published? Did they get off the fucking mailing list? Wikipedia doesn’t say.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3414 hours ago

          It does:

          …the paper was reviewed, and its appropriateness for the journal’s publishing criteria was rated as “excellent” by the journal’s peer-review process. It was accepted for publication with minor editorial changes. The paper was not actually published, as Vamplew declined to pay the required US$150 article processing charge. This case has led commenters to question the legitimacy of the journal as an authentic scholarly undertaking.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 hours ago

            This case has led commenters to question the legitimacy of the journal as an authentic scholarly undertaking.

            Gotta love the “please don’t sue us” phrasing there.

          • @Viking_Hippie
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            The paper was not actually published, as Vamplew declined to pay the required US$150 article processing charge

            At first I was like “come on! Do it for the bit!”, but then I remembered that, far from having the “make a Broadway sized song and dance number telling mining mogul Bob Murray to eat shit”* money of Last Week Tonight, scientists tend to be less than extravagant in their capital holdings…

            What a way to end the season, though! ❤️😂

            *which was nominated for the Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Original Music and Lyrics in 2020

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            413 hours ago

            Oh, thank you. I stopped reading when it started to talk about someone else 9 years later, I thought it would be some other controversy. I wish he crowdsourced the $150 though. I wonder how many citations it could have gotten…