• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2729 days ago

    I wonder if their recent bid to take over Intel, is related.

    The irony would be very thik as Qualcomm played a big role in killing Intel’s 2010er efforts to enter the mobile sector.

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      3029 days ago

      Qualcomm is not trying to take over Intel.

      Not only has it been denied by both parties, it would 100% not go ahead. Additionally, it would invalidate the x86 cross-licence that AMD and Intel have, meaning Intel would no longer be able to make modern x86 CPUs. Frankly it’s also somewhat doubtful Qualcomm wants to take Intel on.

      The rumour was likely someone trying to pump up the stock and sell.

      • Toes♀
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I’m just being a little pedantic. But I believe you meant x64?

        Edit: x86_64 thanks guys

        • @woelkchen
          link
          English
          829 days ago

          X64 doesn’t exist. Microsoft used the label for Windows for a while to distinguish from IA64 (Itanium) and 32bit x86 editions of Windows but these days Microsoft moved mostly away from those labels and only uses them when talking about ARM.

        • @Defaced
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          They did, AMD holds the x64 license, Intel holds the x86.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            829 days ago

            The x86 license itself doesn’t matter much anymore. Those patents expired a long time ago. Early x86_64 is held by AMD, but those patents are also expiring soon.

            There’s more advancements past that which are held by both Intel and AMD. You still can’t make a modern x86 CPU on your own. Soon, you’ll be able to make a CPU with an instruction set compatible with the first Athlon 64-bit processors, but that’s as far as it goes.