• @CAVOKOP
    link
    English
    121 month ago

    The “art of the deal” man really didn’t know what he was doing when he undermined NATO. This was the real wake up call to Europe that the US couldn’t be relied upon and that while alliances after fine, we really need to step up our military game, and part of that is to make sure we have our own equipment.

    We should work tighter together and reduce waste by focusing on one model of tank, one or two IFV, etc instead of the large number we have now, mainly due to national interests.

    I say start building an EU army, but start from the ground and build the whole chain, with focus on EU supplied equipment.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      You should have at least two different tank models. Not 20 but one is too small and you risk a flaw being a problem for everything

      • @CAVOKOP
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        I mean MBTs. How many do we have in Europe? 5? 6?

        The Americans have one. The Abrahams.

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I don’t know, I know Germany has a tank, UK has a tank, and Poland is building the Korean tank. I’m not aware of others, but I wouldn’t be surprised if you are right. I agree 5 is too many, 2-3 is a good number, enough that nobody gets stuck on a bad design. Not so many that scale (which is already low on a tank until we are at war and need many) can’t happen at all.

          • @CAVOKOP
            link
            English
            31 month ago

            Italy has the Ariete and France the Leclerc. I think there are a few in eastern Europe as well, but that might be modified Russian tanks. Not sure about those, sorry guys.

            My point is that it’s far too many. 2 max, and that’s stretching it. If the US can manage with one, so can we.