• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren’t any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

    • @nomous
      link
      03 months ago

      If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

      Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it’s convenient.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        That doesn’t work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

        • @nomous
          link
          03 months ago

          That doesn’t work in this context

          one just is a worse murderer

          Seems like it works just fine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn’t a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

      • @Cleggory
        link
        -23 months ago

        If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

        It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

        • @nomous
          link
          23 months ago

          It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            an argument that was never made

            It says 0 scandals right there in the post

            Just because the other guy also has scandals doesn’t mean she has 0

          • @Cleggory
            link
            03 months ago

            You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

            If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

            If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

            • @nomous
              link
              03 months ago

              Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

              If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

              Hope this clarified my meaning.

              • @Cleggory
                link
                03 months ago

                Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

                Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

                • @nomous
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

                  Whatever helps you sleep at night

                  • @Cleggory
                    link
                    23 months ago

                    Apathy was too big of a word for you??