• @Buffalox
    link
    English
    51 month ago

    That really stopped being true in the Skylake era

    Absolutely, the 14nm process was leading when it was new, but the delays and ultimate failure of 10nm caused Intel to fall way behind. But before that from the very beginning of integrated circuits, Intel was the leader in manufacturing. From the late 70’s Intel when Intel made the i8086 they achieved an economic advantage, that enabled them to stay ahead pretty much consistently in manufacturing.
    In 2016 TSMC achieved parity with their 10nm equivalent to Intel 14nm with maybe a slight advantage over Intel, and after that it’s well known that TSMC continued quickly improving past the points where Intel had failed, and TSMC became the leader.

    I should have written always prior to 2016. Because it’s 8 years ago now, but before that, Intel had stayed on top for half a century. Despite for instance M68000 and Alpha were way better processor designs than anything Intel had.

    there’s no case where I’d want to buy Intel over AMD if they cost the same and perform similarly,

    I agree, the only reason I quote this, is because of the insane change in how Intel vs AMD is viewed compared to before Ryzen! Compared to AMD FX series, the Intel Core and Core2 were so superior, it was hard to see how AMD could come back from that. But when Ryzen was presented late 2016 it was clear to me they had something new and exciting. And they really elevated desktop performance after years of minor iterations from Intel.

    • @GamingChairModel
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      Compared to AMD FX series, the Intel Core and Core2 were so superior, it was hard to see how AMD could come back from that.

      Yup, an advantage in this industry doesn’t last forever, and a lead in a particular generation doesn’t necessarily translate to the next paradigm.

      Canon wants to challenge ASML and get back in the lithography game, with a tooling shift they’ve been working on for 10 years. The Japanese “startup” Rapidus wants to get into the foundry game by starting with 2nm, and they’ve got the backing of pretty much the entirety of the Japanese electronics industry.

      TSMC is holding onto finFET a little bit longer than Samsung and Intel, as those two switch to gate all around FETs (GAAFETS). Which makes sense, because those two never got to the point where they could compete with TSMC on finFETs, so they’re eager to move onto the next thing a bit earlier while TSMC squeezes out the last bit of profit from their established advantage.

      Nothing lasts forever, and the future is always uncertain. The past history of the semiconductor industry is a constant reminder of that.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        True, but with AMD the problem was that they had serious deficits and were near bankruptcy.
        And these technologies are getting more an more expensive. The latest tapeout Apple did for M3, is estimated to have cost $1 billion. That’s for tapeout alone!!!

        We are at a point where this technology is so prohibitively expensive, that only the biggest global players can play.

        • @GamingChairModel
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          The thing is, if Intel doesn’t actually get 18A and beyond competitive, it might be on a death spiral towards bankruptcy as well. Yes, they’ve got a ton of cash on hand and several very profitable business lines, but that won’t last forever, and they need plans to turn profits in the future, too.

          • @Buffalox
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            Yes that’s true, Intel has been behind for almost 8 years, but they’ve had massive ressources to make a comeback, A luxury AMD never had.
            AMD was kept out of the market so they barely made money even when they were clearly ahead.

            And only now after 8 years Intel is having a fiscal year deficit. That’s not comparable to the situation AMD was in when they made their comeback.

            But I agree that unless Intel succeed on 18A, things are not looking good. But there’s some way yet until they are in a similar situation to where AMD was in 2016 when Ryzen was revealed.