French immigrants are eating our pets!

  • Pennomi
    link
    English
    1941 month ago

    I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.

    But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.

    • @db2
      link
      531 month ago

      There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?

    • kronisk
      link
      52
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.

      It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.

      Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        251 month ago

        Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        221 month ago

        Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.

        • kronisk
          link
          131 month ago

          Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 month ago

        Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.

        Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.

        Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.

        • @Hackworth
          link
          English
          71 month ago

          I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.