French immigrants are eating our pets!

  • Pennomi
    link
    English
    1118 hours ago

    I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.

    But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.

    • kronisk
      link
      25
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.

      It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.

      Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        205 hours ago

        Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        125 hours ago

        Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.

        • kronisk
          link
          65 hours ago

          Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though

    • @db2
      link
      337 hours ago

      There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        196 hours ago

        There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.