French immigrants are eating our pets!

  • @Meron35
    link
    257 minutes ago

    Well duh it detects AI generated images that are at scale and that snail cat is way too small for it

  • @jaybone
    link
    31 hour ago

    What tool is this? I assume the tool is also AI based?

  • @cley_faye
    link
    19
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    …you know people made fake pictures before image generation, right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 hours ago

    It has been 0 days since classified military gene research has been leaked by interrogating ai detecting models

  • @DrMorose
    link
    339 hours ago

    “We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”

  • Pennomi
    link
    English
    14011 hours ago

    I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.

    But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.

    • kronisk
      link
      33
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.

      It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.

      Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 hours ago

        Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.

        Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.

        Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.

        • @Hackworth
          link
          English
          11 hour ago

          I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.

      • Pennomi
        link
        English
        239 hours ago

        Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        159 hours ago

        Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.

        • kronisk
          link
          79 hours ago

          Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though

    • @db2
      link
      4511 hours ago

      There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?

  • @TropicalDingdong
    link
    2411 hours ago

    I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.

  • @brucethemoose
    link
    3
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Honestly, they should fight fire with fire? Another vision model (like Qwen VL) would catch this

    You can ask it “does this image seem fake?” and it would look at it, reason something out and conclude it’s fake, instead of… I dunno, looking for smaller patters or whatever their internal model does?

  • @neanderthal
    link
    5
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    My guess is the AI was trained on a combination of cat videos and sponge bob.