• @acosmichippo
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I don’t think “normal” people are looking at any of the details. The big lie will be out there regardless.

    Also you should consider voter intimidation any time proven violent gangs are hanging around polls, whether they are doing so “peacefully” or not.

    edit:

    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/guide-laws-against-intimidation-voters-and-election-workers

    Intimidating conduct can take many forms. For example, courts have found the following conduct to constitute unlawful intimidation:

    …efforts to closely follow, monitor, or surveil voters at polling places

    and improper threats of potential criminal prosecution, arrest, or other legal action.

    • @Carrolade
      link
      English
      116 days ago

      I’m not so sure, things are easy to google these days. And yes, I did mention that unarmed and nonviolently was a lot to ask for.

      • @acosmichippo
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        but there are even nonviolent ways they can intimidate people that is against the law.

        https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/guide-laws-against-intimidation-voters-and-election-workers

        Intimidating conduct can take many forms. For example, courts have found the following conduct to constitute unlawful intimidation:

        …efforts to closely follow, monitor, or surveil voters at polling places

        and improper threats of potential criminal prosecution, arrest, or other legal action.

        not to mention the mere presence of such a notorious group may be intimidating, it’s like an unspoken threat. I certainly would not feel 100% comfortable with them there - would you?

        • @Carrolade
          link
          English
          116 days ago

          Yeah that’s a fair point.