• @Carrolade
    link
    English
    32 months ago

    True. But they’re still adding evidence. We can point to things like the mail worker delivering the mail-in ballots the other day. While sure, a whole bunch of people will see that and cry foul, those people were already lost. But a normal person can watch the video that was recorded and see with their own eyes a postal worker going about their day-to-day job.

    I think that video hurt Trump’s fraud claims in the long run, despite it initially going viral as some kind of nefarious plot. They shot themselves in the foot, as they so often do.

    • @acosmichippo
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t think “normal” people are looking at any of the details. The big lie will be out there regardless.

      Also you should consider voter intimidation any time proven violent gangs are hanging around polls, whether they are doing so “peacefully” or not.

      edit:

      https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/guide-laws-against-intimidation-voters-and-election-workers

      Intimidating conduct can take many forms. For example, courts have found the following conduct to constitute unlawful intimidation:

      …efforts to closely follow, monitor, or surveil voters at polling places

      and improper threats of potential criminal prosecution, arrest, or other legal action.

      • @Carrolade
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        I’m not so sure, things are easy to google these days. And yes, I did mention that unarmed and nonviolently was a lot to ask for.

        • @acosmichippo
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          but there are even nonviolent ways they can intimidate people that is against the law.

          https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/guide-laws-against-intimidation-voters-and-election-workers

          Intimidating conduct can take many forms. For example, courts have found the following conduct to constitute unlawful intimidation:

          …efforts to closely follow, monitor, or surveil voters at polling places

          and improper threats of potential criminal prosecution, arrest, or other legal action.

          not to mention the mere presence of such a notorious group may be intimidating, it’s like an unspoken threat. I certainly would not feel 100% comfortable with them there - would you?

          • @Carrolade
            link
            English
            12 months ago

            Yeah that’s a fair point.