• @IndustryStandardOP
      link
      -102 months ago

      Harris did not win. Proving the lesser evil argument failed to win over voters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 months ago

        People didn’t choose the lesser evil, they only chose their kind of evil. Which is unquestionably the greater one.

        • @IndustryStandardOP
          link
          -5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Your argument of lesser evil is irrelevant. The voters have proven this.

          Fearmongering is how Fascists win over voters. Kamala was the lesser Fascist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            I don’t understand why it is irrelevant and how voters choosing greater evil proved this.

            What are you even trying to say - that there’s no such thing as lesser evil because voters chose greater evil? Or that Kamala is no lesser evil, because voters chose greater evil?

            • @IndustryStandardOP
              link
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering. They get to run on hope.

              When the response to genocide is “Trump would be worse!” there is no hope offered. Everything in this campaign was fearmongering. And Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering to make people support their genocidal fascism.

              Instead they should have provided actual policies to give hope. No genocide. Healthcare. Union rights. Not Liz Cheney.

              Not “fascism but a little less than Trump.”

        • @IndustryStandardOP
          link
          12 months ago

          Yes Trump did a better job at fearmongering. That is what Republicans do.

        • @IndustryStandardOP
          link
          12 months ago

          You do not understand.

          I am saying Harris should not have tried to be a lesser evil but a greater good.

            • @IndustryStandardOP
              link
              22 months ago

              Doing a little less genocide is bad

              Not doing genocide is good.

              How is this so difficult to understand?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                02 months ago

                Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot

                If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.

                • @IndustryStandardOP
                  link
                  22 months ago

                  Because not doing genocide is not on the menu.

                  Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu.

                  Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    22 months ago

                    The US is going to go more and more fascist because the left can’t get their shit together, and a big part of the reason we can’t get our shit together is because the Democrats keep dividing us.

            • @IndustryStandardOP
              link
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Enough people would have voted for her if she did. But she did not.