• @IndustryStandardOP
    link
    -102 months ago

    Harris did not win. Proving the lesser evil argument failed to win over voters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      People didn’t choose the lesser evil, they only chose their kind of evil. Which is unquestionably the greater one.

      • @IndustryStandardOP
        link
        -5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Your argument of lesser evil is irrelevant. The voters have proven this.

        Fearmongering is how Fascists win over voters. Kamala was the lesser Fascist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          I don’t understand why it is irrelevant and how voters choosing greater evil proved this.

          What are you even trying to say - that there’s no such thing as lesser evil because voters chose greater evil? Or that Kamala is no lesser evil, because voters chose greater evil?

          • @IndustryStandardOP
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering. They get to run on hope.

            When the response to genocide is “Trump would be worse!” there is no hope offered. Everything in this campaign was fearmongering. And Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering to make people support their genocidal fascism.

            Instead they should have provided actual policies to give hope. No genocide. Healthcare. Union rights. Not Liz Cheney.

            Not “fascism but a little less than Trump.”

      • @IndustryStandardOP
        link
        12 months ago

        Yes Trump did a better job at fearmongering. That is what Republicans do.

      • @IndustryStandardOP
        link
        12 months ago

        You do not understand.

        I am saying Harris should not have tried to be a lesser evil but a greater good.

          • @IndustryStandardOP
            link
            22 months ago

            Doing a little less genocide is bad

            Not doing genocide is good.

            How is this so difficult to understand?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot

              If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.

              • @IndustryStandardOP
                link
                22 months ago

                Because not doing genocide is not on the menu.

                Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu.

                Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 months ago

                  The US is going to go more and more fascist because the left can’t get their shit together, and a big part of the reason we can’t get our shit together is because the Democrats keep dividing us.

          • @IndustryStandardOP
            link
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Enough people would have voted for her if she did. But she did not.