• @TotallynotJessica
      link
      152 months ago

      It’ll stay that way, as fascists love their guns too. There are too many guns for anybody to get rid of them. If you play your cards right, you can get them from broke fascists when the economy crashes. Bullets will be the hard part.

        • @TotallynotJessica
          link
          172 months ago

          Shotguns are also safer in urban areas thanks to lower penetration. Even 9mm can go through multiple walls and hit innocents. It’s why gang shootings are so awful.

    • @einlander
      link
      102 months ago

      I have a 3d printer. That is a statement. That is all.

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        272 months ago

        The gun isn’t to fight the military. It’s to protect against random acts of political violence.

        • @disguy_ovahea
          link
          62 months ago

          I would expect more political violence had Harris won. With Trump as the winner, wouldn’t violent hate crimes be the bigger concern?

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            24
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Under the first Trump presidency, there was a substantial increase in politically motivated hate crime. So the answer to your question is both are true. If your existence isn’t a political issue, then you should still get armed to defend the people around you.

          • @Arbiter
            link
            12 months ago

            Which is something people must defend against.

      • @NegativeInf
        link
        122 months ago

        An easy option for leaving the situation to be suffered by people that aren’t oneself.

        When the fascists come for me, a gun will look like a good alternative to a death camp.