Support will be removed on both client and server side.

The process of removing OpenVPN from our app starts today and may be completed much earlier.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    734 days ago

    Except the 5 device limit. With OVPN it means 5 connected devices, with WG it means 5 registered public keys.

    Say you use the official Mullvad app and also setup some 3rd party WG client on your phone. That’s now taking up 2 devices. Or perhaps you do have 6 devices, but you never have more than 2 of them running at once. With WG, that’s still 6 devices regardless of them being connected or not, while with OVPN it will indeed be just 2 devices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 days ago

      That’s true. I use user profiles on GrapheneOS and have to have each profile count as its own device in Mullvad, when obviously I’m not going to be using them simultaneously.

    • @gaylord_fartmaster
      link
      294 days ago

      Can you not use the same keys for multiple devices like you’d normally be able to?

      • @JoeKrogan
        link
        154 days ago

        Not at the same time as they would conflict.

        • @gaylord_fartmaster
          link
          304 days ago

          Well sure, but you effectively still have the same 5-connection limit as long as you manage your keys correctly.

      • @lemming741
        link
        English
        44 days ago

        That’s always borked both connections for me

    • @PunkiBas
      link
      144 days ago

      This is a great point, if they’re gonna make this change, they should allow unlimited keys (or at least more than 5) and just limit the number of simultaneous devices on wireguard too. If that’s feasable

      • NekuSoul
        link
        fedilink
        124 days ago

        It might be feasible, but it’s a bit awkward to implement because Wireguard is stateless and doesn’t know if a client is offline or just hasn’t sent any traffic for some time.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That’s a pity.

      Is there something preventing you from having the same key ready for use on more than one device? So that two devices that are never connected at the same time can take turns using the same key?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 days ago

      One of my devices uses three keys because out of the two local servers I have, they seem to go down every other month, so I need a failover.

    • @devfuuu
      link
      14 days ago

      It just sounds easier to think about it with wireguard then. No surprises.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        124 days ago

        I already commented on this, but do they actually block you from setting up multiple devices with the same key?

        I’ve had my own server node for a while, there’s nothing stopping me from using the same key and config on multiple client devices, as long as I don’t connect them at the same time.

        I’m not limited to five keys, obviously, but the keys aren’t device specific. I could set up just one on the server, and then use it everywhere.

        Does Mullwad stop this in some way?