• @marx2k
    link
    -511 month ago

    Removed by mod

    • @jordanlund
      shield
      M
      link
      191 month ago

      Banging a 17 year old in a state where the age of consent is 18 makes the argument irrelevant.

      • @marx2k
        link
        -121 month ago

        It absolutely doesn’t

        • @eskimofry
          link
          121 month ago

          Legally you’re wrong. Morally too but legally also.

          • Jerkface (any/all)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            “Pedophilia” is a psychological term, not a legal one. Perhaps you are looking for “rape.”

            Treating “pedophile” as a synonym for “child molester” is like treating “schizophrenic” as a synonym for “axe murder”. Using psychological conditions as slurs and everyday metaphors is harmful.

          • @marx2k
            link
            -71 month ago

            Explain how I’m wrong? Or did you think banging a 17 year old is literally pedophilia?

            It’s annoying when right wing weirdos label everyone that disagrees with them a pedo, it’s not any less annoying when it’s done by everyone else.

              • @marx2k
                link
                21 month ago

                I was often finding myself beyond labeled as a pedo. On twitter. By maga morons that label everyone they disagree with a pedo.

                I did rethink some things and went to lemmy. I guess not much changes.

                  • @marx2k
                    link
                    21 month ago

                    No one said everyone. I said maga weirdos that label everyone they disagree with as a pedo.

                    Welcome to that club, I guess.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Arguing that wanting to have sex with a minor is anything but is a take, and definitely has me glad Boost supports user tagging.

    • @ChronosTriggerWarning
      link
      341 month ago

      Would you prefer the terminology “raped a minor?” That help you sleep at night?

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          81 month ago

          In Florida the age of consent is 16 … if the other person is under 24.

      • @marx2k
        link
        11 month ago

        Sure, that works

        • @ChronosTriggerWarning
          link
          71 month ago

          So, based on your phrasing “banging a17yo,” I’m gonna guess that your issue is with the label pedophile and not the ACT OF RAPING CHILDREN. Glad that’s been established.

            • @ChronosTriggerWarning
              link
              21 month ago

              And you’re mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence. Must be nice, what, with all that bliss and all. 😘

          • @marx2k
            link
            -41 month ago

            Again, words have meanings. I’m sorry that makes you emotional and require all caps to try and make your point.

        • @ChronosTriggerWarning
          link
          31 month ago

          Pedos don’t like being called pedos. More groundbreaking news at 11. Back to you, Tom.

    • Norah - She/They
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not even a crime in most states: https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/age-of-consent-in-each-us-state-1701408847-1

      (This is coming from an Aussie where 16 is the AoC in all states. We have exceptions that make it 18 if the other party has a duty of care tho)

      Edit: I should add that it’s still fucking creepy and weird when an older man does this. Just, not pedophilia, and not by default (statutory) rape in most places. Unlike what the people in this thread seem to think.

      It’s almost like we shouldn’t water down such serious terms by lumping everything in with it.

      • @eskimofry
        link
        01 month ago

        You fucking think its not fucking serious that a 40+ year old paid a 17 yo for sex?

        • Norah - She/They
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          There’s not an answer I can give that is going to satisfy you, so what’s the point in me giving you one?

          • @eskimofry
            link
            -11 month ago

            You can give the obvious right answer and you refuse to do so.

            • Norah - She/They
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              I already gave the “obvious right answer”:

              Edit: I should add that it’s still fucking creepy and weird when an older man does this. Just, not pedophilia, and not by default (statutory) rape in most places. Unlike what the people in this thread seem to think.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Don’t be him. Language is fluid.

      • @marx2k
        link
        31 month ago

        Words have definitions

        • Flying Squid
          link
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Indeed they do. And since you seem to be under the impression that those definitions do not change, please define ‘silly’ for me as it was defined when it began to be used in late Middle English.

          I feel you’re being silly regardless of the early or current definition of the word, but I’m betting you also don’t use the word that way.

          • @marx2k
            link
            -11 month ago

            Define pedophilia for me

            • Flying Squid
              link
              21 month ago

              I believe I asked you for a definition first. I’m not sure why you expect me to do that when you won’t.

              • Jerkface (any/all)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Because your request was rhetorical and his is not, having a concrete answer that is actually fucking relevant and essential to the discussion.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  21 month ago

                  I’m glad you’ve determined that on my behalf, but I don’t remember hiring you as my spokesperson.

        • @pyre
          link
          11 month ago

          based on how people use them, not ordained by the gods of language. people say pedophile to mean someone who rapes a minor.

          • @marx2k
            link
            11 month ago

            I mean you can also say someone is a murderer of they eat cabbage, but you’d be wrong.

            Calling everyone you dislike a pedo is as lame as calling everyone you dislike a commie or Hitler.

            Seriously… having sex with or raping a 17 year old doesn’t make you a pedophile. It makes you a statutory rapist. That’s bad enough without having to make dumb shit up as an insult.

            I’m surprised and disappointed so many on lemmy are falling into that sort of weak bullshit but… here we are

            • @pyre
              link
              21 month ago

              what you should be disappointed in is not being able to make an argument without strawmanning multiple times.

              what you’re doing is just refusing to cooperate on language that’s already obvious and widely understood. it’s bad faith.

              • @marx2k
                link
                01 month ago

                I’ve made the argument countless times. If you want to call raping a 17 year old pedophilia, that’s up to you. I’m not going to call a swimming pool a lake.