• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
    link
    English
    31 month ago

    Using the remaining 99% of the cost to bury batteries underground would seem reasonable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Batteries can be containerized in modules, with a turnkey connection that remains mobile. Solar can use those containers as support structure. Hydrogen electrolyzer/fuel cells can also be built in same containers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Underground construction generally isn’t cost effective. It costs way more to get dirt and rock out of the way than just building a frame upwards. There might be other reasons to do it, but you want to avoid it if possible.

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        The underground suggestion was only to counter the argument of space usage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          There’s a million other ways to go. Solar on every parking lot, over every irrigation canal, and along every highway. Some farming can be done under solar panels, as well; some commercial crops prefer shade, such as strawberries.

          The US uses about 30% of its land for cows. One simple plan is that we all eat one less burger a week. Which would be a good idea, anyway.

          Land usage is so not a problem as soon as you open up the dual use possibilities.