• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 month ago

    Underground construction generally isn’t cost effective. It costs way more to get dirt and rock out of the way than just building a frame upwards. There might be other reasons to do it, but you want to avoid it if possible.

    • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      The underground suggestion was only to counter the argument of space usage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        There’s a million other ways to go. Solar on every parking lot, over every irrigation canal, and along every highway. Some farming can be done under solar panels, as well; some commercial crops prefer shade, such as strawberries.

        The US uses about 30% of its land for cows. One simple plan is that we all eat one less burger a week. Which would be a good idea, anyway.

        Land usage is so not a problem as soon as you open up the dual use possibilities.