• @WhyFlip
    link
    English
    16 hours ago

    There’s no template that is looked for in my company’s case. And it’s not black and white, accept/reject, rather it’s trained to score applicants on a predefined set of criteria set by my company. It’s used as a tool to basically sort the resumes from strongest to weakest, most applicable to least. Depending on how many resumes are received, all of them might still be reviewed by a human. We don’t and never have used a candidate’s name at any point in the review process.

    “Neurodivergent” had to have been a front runner for 2024 word of the year.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      English
      -16 hours ago

      “Neurodivergent” had to have been a front runner for 2024 word of the year.

      Are you suggesting that autism and ADHD are not real conditions?

      • @WhyFlip
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        Not even sure why you’d even ask this as I never said any such thing. Of course ADHD and autism are real conditions.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          I quoted why I asked it. It sure sounds like you’re saying it’s just a meaningless buzzword.

          • @WhyFlip
            link
            English
            133 minutes ago

            You love to assume.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        25 hours ago

        Do you seriously believe that human review of a neurodivergent person’s strangely composed resume is going to be any better? Have you ever sat down with a stack of resumes in your life? Managers will toss them in seconds without even reading them in full - at least AI will do that.

        I think you’re just using neurodivergence as a way to take your miserably uninformed assumptions about how AI application review works, and legitimize them as a discrimination issue.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          English
          -15 hours ago

          You didn’t answer my question.

          • @scarabic
            link
            English
            15 hours ago

            ADHD and Autism are real conditions.

            Now answer every point I made.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              English
              14 hours ago

              I seriously believe a human can view a non-standard resume and make a better judgment about it than a machine. And yes, I have sat down with a stack of resumes. I used to own my own company. That’s exactly how I know someone with a resume that doesn’t fit the traditional template an AI might care about, especially if they have a flair for design, would get my attention as a good candidate.

              I also wouldn’t care if their name was Shonda or Muhammad. AIs, on the other hand, reject people with “ethnic” names.

              Happy now?

              • @WhyFlip
                link
                English
                12 hours ago

                What is this “traditional template” you keep referring to?

                • Flying SquidOP
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Are you serious? You’ve never seen resume templates?

                  Just Google the phrase “resume template” to see lots of them.

                  What do you think AI is trained on when trained to look at resumes? How do you think it decides what is a good resume and a bad resume? Do you think it uses its reasoning abilities?

                  Also: “Thanks for answering my questions.” You’re welcome.

                  • @WhyFlip
                    link
                    English
                    131 minutes ago

                    At my company, they are not trained on templates, as I already mentioned.