@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agoYEETmander.xyzimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1651arrow-down131cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imageYEETmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square116fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish102•2 days agoThere is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it’s minimum speed.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•1 day agoUnfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.
minus-square@Reddfugee42linkEnglish69•2 days agoNotice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid’s migrated all the way to its. Isn’t nature amazing?
minus-squareemmanuel_carlinkfedilink15•2 days agoWhat makes it more amazing is I understood without even noticing the mistake.
minus-squareVictorlinkEnglish1•1 day agoThat’s assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.
minus-square@buddascrayonlinkEnglish-3•edit-22 days agoThe cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 days agoNo no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it’s speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.
There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it’s minimum speed.
Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.
Notice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid’s migrated all the way to its.
Isn’t nature amazing?
What makes it more amazing is I understood without even noticing the mistake.
That’s assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.
The cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.
No no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it’s speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.