• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1061 month ago

    There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it’s minimum speed.

    • @Reddfugee42
      link
      English
      731 month ago

      Notice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid’s migrated all the way to its.

      Isn’t nature amazing?

      • emmanuel_car
        link
        fedilink
        151 month ago

        What makes it more amazing is I understood without even noticing the mistake.

        • @Reddfugee42
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          Curious, that doesn’t seem amazing at all. But to each their own!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 month ago

      Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.

    • Victor
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      That’s assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.

    • @buddascrayon
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 month ago

        No no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it’s speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.