• @Valmond
    link
    English
    110 hours ago

    Maybe it desintegrated and thus vanished from the consecutive frame?

    Atomic blasts are kind of powerful versus an iron lid.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2223 hours ago

    The calculation of its speed was made by high speed camera, as you’ve probably seen the Mythbusters do. In this case the manhole cover was seen in flight in precisely one frame of high speed camera footage, and for it to go “installed, in flight, gone” in three frames means it would have had to be moving at mach jesus.

    It likely didn’t make it to space intact; it would have had ultrasonic compression heating on one side and a nuclear explosion on the other. It’s probably still here in the form of iron oxide dust scattered about the Northwestern hemisphere.

    • @dogma11
      link
      English
      216 hours ago

      I’d like to think that it’s possible that it was launched fast enough that it escaped the blast and Earth’s atmosphere and made its way to a neighboring galaxy where it’s now living lodged in some far off asteroid or some comet or planet.

      Manhole cover first man made object in Andromeda.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        316 hours ago

        This was in what? the 50’s? So it would have had to travel ~2 million light years in 70 years, so it would have had to hit several hundred thousand times the speed of light?

  • @Sam_Bass
    link
    English
    1121 hours ago

    RIP jpgd to death

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 hours ago

      Parker Solar Probe: 191 km per second.

      Nuclear Manhole Cover: 55 km per second

      Voyager 1: 17 km per second

      Voyager 2: 15 km per second

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Nope, it would just have bursted due to thermal schock and pressure. Escape velocity, what are you dreaming, is the lid made of tungsten?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is the origin apparently.

      RRB: “My calculations are irrelevant on this point. They are only valid in speaking of the shock reflection.” Ogle: “How fast did it go?” RRB: “Those numbers are meaningless. I have only a vacuum above the cap. No air, no gravity, no real material strengths in the iron cap. Effectively the cap is just loose, traveling through meaningless space.” Ogle: And how fast is it going?" This last question was more of a shout. Bill liked to have a direct answer to each one of his questions. RRB: “Six times the escape velocity from the earth.”

  • @Professorozone
    link
    English
    602 days ago

    Ummm, not sure where they got these numbers from but Earth’s escape velocity is not 7000mph and escaping the sun’s gravitational pull (leaving the solar system from Earth) is not 30,000mph. Respectively the numbers are approximately 25,000mph and 94,000mph. You’re welcome.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 hours ago

      94000mph is relative to the sun’s surface. Relative to the Earth’s surface, it is around 37000mph, which means they were still wrong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 hours ago

      That’s 11.2 km/s and 42.1 km/s.

      Also, even if the manhole cover was going at above 12 km/s the trajectory has to be right for that to result in orbit. Most paths it would take would result in it going up and then coming back down again. Similarly, if somehow it did manage more than 50 km/s and wasn’t destroyed in the atmosphere, it might have the velocity to escape the sun’s gravity, but probably wouldn’t be on the right path to do it. Most likely it would fall into the sun.

      So, assuming the 125,000 mph (55 km/s) velocity is correct, the most likely outcome is that it was a reverse-meteor, something that burned up going up through the atmosphere, not down. And even if it did have enough speed to get out of the atmosphere, and there was enough of it left, it most likely fell right back down through the atmosphere somewhere else, either burning up on re-entry or hitting the ground (or the water) somewhere else.

      • @druidjaidan
        link
        English
        214 hours ago

        Ignoring that it burned up and ignoring losses due to drag if it somehow didn’t. Isn’t the point of escape velocity that it explicitly won’t come back down.iar least not on earth. Your trajectory won’t matter as you have enough velocity to escape the gravity of earth and will orbit the sun. Further if you managed the solar system escape velocity you will end up orbiting the galactic core. Trajectory doesn’t matter if you have escape velocity. Correct trajectory just minimizes the delta v needed to reach that escape velocity.

        At least that’s all my recollection.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          English
          112 hours ago

          Escape velocity means you could stay in orbit. It doesn’t guarantee anything if you launch at the wrong angle.

    • @Bosht
      link
      English
      232 days ago

      Gotta love Tumblr. Just massive amounts of disinformation and bullshit all the time.

    • @SwordInStone
      link
      English
      41 day ago

      yeah, and it is not “research” to check it. They literally teach it in primary school physics.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 day ago

      I like how they are implying the speed of light is only 500000mph (as opposed to 671,000,000 mph or 1,080,000,000kph)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 minutes ago

          Ah sorry, I should have specified that the post not only got the escape velocity wrong as you pointed out they also got the speed of light wrong near the end.

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    English
    1332 days ago

    This reminds me of that quote from Mass Effect:

    “This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class Dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means: Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space! (…) I dare to assume you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty! Once you fire this hunk of metal, it keeps going 'till it hits something! That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you are ruining someone’s day, somewhere and sometime!”

    • @TwoBeeSan
      link
      English
      38
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That first mass effect can’t be beat for setting the stage and immersing you in the world.

      I can hear the VA in my head lmao

      Edit: I like mass effect I don’t have a good memory

  • @RizzRustbolt
    link
    English
    61 day ago

    How to solve the Three Body Problem.

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    English
    242 days ago

    Ive seen this claim a dozen times. It’s a disc shape. How this thing isn’t going to start flipping and curving its trajectory, or just plain old running out of energy due to air resistance, and not making it out of earth’s atmosphere is beyond me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 hours ago

        Throw it into water or gelatin. At thousands of metres per second the air is going to seem much more dense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 hours ago

          I don’t have the arm strength to trow anything at the speed needed to make your analogy work.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        31 day ago

        If it’s like a frisbee, yeah, but it still curves. Now start it spinning like spinning a coin on edge. The curving will be much more dramatic.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      English
      122 days ago

      It didn’t stay solid upon initial blast impact. Probably didn’t even stay liquid.

      • @Crashumbc
        link
        English
        71 day ago

        Yeah it vanished because it vaporized.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          English
          11 day ago

          I think they were able to track it for at least 2 frames, thus calculate it’s speed.

            • @CheeseNoodle
              link
              English
              31 day ago

              tbf the calculated speed is actually roughly the minnimum based on its starting position and the frame it appeared in. it could have actually been going even faster.

            • @finitebanjo
              link
              English
              21 day ago

              One frame before the blast and one frame after, but semantics.

              • Victor
                link
                English
                01 day ago

                I don’t count having no visual indication of the object as “tracking” it, if we’re talking semantics. One frame could equal an even faster speed than what it would minimally take to cross the entire width of the image at some trajectory vector. For other vectors, it could be (much) less (like not passing straight through the image from on side to the opposite side, e.g.).

                It’s important to not hang too hard on this as the escape speed is dependent on air resistance, or rather lack thereof. Those escape speed numbers are defined along with the assumption of zero air resistance or other forces acting on the object.

                • @finitebanjo
                  link
                  English
                  222 hours ago

                  You can use the frame from before to calculate the MINIMUM speed. It could have been going even faster.

            • Victor
              link
              English
              112 hours ago

              lol what

  • Radioactive Butthole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Most likely it just evaporated, or disintegrated or something, but I think its pretty unlikely it survived that absolutely bonkers acceleration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1022 days ago

    There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it’s minimum speed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 day ago

      Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.

    • @Reddfugee42
      link
      English
      692 days ago

      Notice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid’s migrated all the way to its.

      Isn’t nature amazing?

      • emmanuel_car
        link
        fedilink
        152 days ago

        What makes it more amazing is I understood without even noticing the mistake.

    • Victor
      link
      English
      11 day ago

      That’s assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.

    • @buddascrayon
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 days ago

        No no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it’s speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.

  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 days ago

    Responding to the last comment in the image:

    You could literally just do reverse Starship Troopers, the movie at least.

    You’re a bunch of aliens and blam out of no where the nuclear launched manhole obliterates a holy site on your homeworld, your scientists track the trajectory back to Earth, conclude they must have launched it intentionally, and then launch an interstellar jihad against totally unaware Earthlings.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 days ago

      That reminds drag of Halo, though significantly more silly.

      In Halo, the Covenant are on an interstellar crusade for holy artifacts left behind by the Forerunners. When they discovered the planet Harvest, inhabited by humans, they saw tons of artifacts on their scanners. So naturally, they landed on the planet and started blasting the humans to steal the artifacts. But the more humans they killed, the more artifacts disappeared from their monitors. The humans must be destroying the artifacts out of petty spite! What heresy!

      The Prophet of Truth is curious about what kind of artifacts the humans have, so he goes to talk to an ancient Forerunner AI they have in storage, Mendicant Bias. Truth shows Bias the symbol that they keep seeing on human worlds. Bias says “You fool, you’ve got it upside down. Turn it around, see? It says Reclaimer. It means a person the Forerunners have chosen to inherit their empire. You’ve just been killing these humans? No wonder the reclaimers keep disappearing, you’re the one who’s doing it!”

      So Truth realises that he’s been ordering his troops to kill what should rightfully be considered demigods by his religion, and who he should be worshipping. And he realises that if he reveals this information to the people, he and the other Prophets will lose all their political power since there are Actual Fucking Gods walking around. So naturally, Truth declares a Holy Genocide against humanity so that nobody will ever figure out that he’s guilty of Deicide and that their entire religious political structure is a lie.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      Or, you just decided on first contact, but, suddenly, ship goes boom after being struck in the propulsion system with a bullet like manhole cover.