kingthrillgore to [email protected] • 2 months agoI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1634arrow-down15
arrow-up1629arrow-down1imageI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlkingthrillgore to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square@Atlusblink52•2 months agoYes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoWhich policy though? He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•2 months ago“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
minus-square@kautaulink3•2 months agoshhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-3•2 months agoGore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?
…you don’t say?
Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
Which policy though?
He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
Gorilla policy
“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
He opposed the war in Iraq
Gore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?