kingthrillgore to [email protected] • 7 hours agoI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down12
arrow-up1374arrow-down1imageI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlkingthrillgore to [email protected] • 7 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-square@Atlusblink31•7 hours agoYes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•7 hours agoWhich policy though? He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•2 hours agoGore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•6 hours ago“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
minus-square@kautaulink2•4 hours agoshhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
Which policy though?
He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
He opposed the war in Iraq
Gore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?
Gorilla policy
“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures