• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -52 months ago

    It should’ve been a retirement account. It would make it solvent forever. Instead it is a system that depends on ever growing population.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      It should have been a proper entitlement instead of worker funded.

      If we fund it through general taxes instead of payroll, you have the wonderful effect where everyone is covered and the program can never go insolvent. When population dynamics result in a generation of retirees bigger than the current workforce you just need to change tax rates or deficit spend.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        102 months ago

        They could also remove the cap on it.

        • @CharlesDarwin
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          Yeah, but that would hurt the feelings of billionaires.

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It already is solvent forever. Every year, it collects money from workers and pays it out to retirees. It can do this forever.

    • @ChonkyOwlbear
      link
      22 months ago

      It doesn’t depend on an ever growing population. It depends on a certain percentage of people dying before they collect.