Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

  • fatalicus
    link
    English
    181 month ago

    They want to strip away everything that reduces infant mortality, so that people start having more kids again since so many of them will die young.

    Then later they give it back, and since they already took away the right to abortion… Boom, population explosion and a bunch of poor kids are born to later be exploited in factories and wars.

    • ZeroOne
      link
      English
      -901 month ago

      Removed by mod

      • @Brainsploosh
        link
        English
        291 month ago

        If you don’t want to have an abortion, no one’s ever been forcing you.

        Why you think it’s appropriate to force others is weird.

        • ZeroOne
          link
          English
          -361 month ago

          Removed by mod

          • @WolfingHour
            link
            English
            101 month ago

            Nah, you don’t really believe that.

            You already know that in an abortion, no one is typically killing the fetus (which btw is less of a human than a chicken egg is human), they’re just removing it from the body it’s parasiting off of. Not the mother’s fault it can’t survive, and I’m pretty sure you’re for curing cancer or tape worm which also contain more human dna than a fetus does.

            Besides, in many cases the fetus is already dead or terminal anyway.

            And even if this was codified under law as murder, it wouldn’t be the mother doing it, but a licensed professional, much like police, soldiers or wardens.

            Thats’s a lot of mental gymnastics to insert yourself into someone’s health care and sex life. That’s kind of weird…

            • @militaryintelligence
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              Republicans have spread this myth that women use abortion like birth control. Just like the myth of the black welfare Queen, spitting out kids just to draw a check. It’s all bullshit and they know it, they just hate poor people.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              tape worm which also contain more human dna than a fetus does.

              Not that im disagreeing with your overall argument, but a fetus has 100% human dna… otherwise it wouldnt develop into a human lol

              • @Brainsploosh
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                A fetus does indeed have 100% human DNA, but a tape worm has about 70% human DNA.

                An 8 week fetus is about 20 g, an 8 week tape worm can become up to 30 ft, weighing several pounds. 70 % of a pound is more than 20 g.

                And with the new slave mother laws, the fetus isn’t more than a handful of grams at the cut off date, making it all the more poignant.

      • @WhatYouNeed
        link
        English
        231 month ago

        It’s a fetus, not a child.

        • ZeroOne
          link
          English
          -381 month ago

          Removed by mod

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            151 month ago

            Okay, I don’t agree with the emotional concept that a fetus is a person innately, but I can at least understand where that type of thinking comes from. Claiming it’s a fully-developed human is just demonstrably wrong. You’re entitled to your opinion, but feelings aren’t facts. I sincerely hope this is a sad attempt at trolling.

            • ZeroOne
              link
              English
              -311 month ago

              Removed by mod

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                101 month ago

                Claims science, states no actual science, strawmans up an example that isn’t related to the original in any way. claims gaslighting with no actual reference to gaslighting behavior.

                No slurs or personal attacks, but i feel like you’re going for the subtle approach so you probably don’t need those right now.

                Hmm, so this is up there, i feel like it’s missing something though, can’t quite place what, but i’ll keep an eye on the replies in case i spot it.

                Anyway, 8/10 shitpost, good job, no notes.


                While i have you, it sounds like you are a person familiar with how science works and will give me an actual answer rather than deflect.

                What is the scientific definition of “parasite”?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 month ago

                What is your solution for fetal anomalies that will inevitably lead to stillbirth or death in the first few hours of life? What is your solution for pregnancy abnormalities that put the life of the mother at serious risk? What is your solution for women who are desperately trying to escape monstrously abusive relationships that got pregnant from marital rape or coercion?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  61 month ago

                  That’s…optimistic.

                  I feel like you’re expecting a rational discourse with someone who so far has gone with “BaBy MurDerErS” and “YEah,bUt SciEnCe is On My sIDe” ( without actually stating how ).

                  They aren’t addressing unwanted pregnancies, medical complication, sexual assault and things outside their carefully crafted headcannon, on purpose.

                  You’re gonna get handwaving at best, probably some strawman example, righteous indignation with no explained basis perhaps a personal attack.

                  I would not at all be surprised if they were bordering on the belief that victims of sexual assault can just “decide” to not get pregnant.

                  That’s the level of critical thinking you’re working with here, i’d manage my expectations if i were you.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    41 month ago

                    I unfortunately attend a religious university for medical school (not by choice, mind you), so I am quite familiar with the mindset displayed here from people with substantially better education.

                • ZeroOne
                  link
                  English
                  -111 month ago

                  Removed by mod

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    71 month ago

                    Screening means termination of non viable fetuses or carrying to stillbirth. Gene therapy is only available for one disease in humans and it isn’t a fetal anomaly. There are malformations that are not compatible with life that are random chance and not something you can predict through genetic analysis.

                    In America, the leading cause of death of pregnant women is intimate partner homicide. The 2 most lethal times in an abusive relationship are when the victim is trying to leave or the victim is pregnant.

                    Many women are pressured or coerced into unprotected sex by male partners and most courts wouldn’t prosecute those cases as rape because the woman eventually “consented” under browbeating and duress.

                    The majority of abortions are sought by women who already have children and are not able to afford or to care for another child and the pregnancy was unplanned. Many other abortions are for serious health problems with the mother or the fetus. Functionally no one is getting abortions as birth control or “recreationally”. It is an unpleasant procedure and women who go through with it do so for important, valid reasons, and your beliefs have no place getting between a woman and the physician caring for her.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    5
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    So damn, this is some premium quality posting right here…let’s see…what do we have?

                    • So we have a response that sounds like it should answer a question posed, but actually doesn’t.
                    • A concession that baby-muder is in fact ok as long as it fits the criteria that you seem to have decided on, then some sneaky goalpoast moving.
                    • “women should be required to carry rapists embryo’s to term because there’s therapy for that”…i mean…wow…that’s going in my classics list.
                    • Using “Innocent child” without defining what child means and ignoring all current science on the matter.
                    • Claiming you’re own country has the solution but not stating what it is or where.

                    I’m officially impressed, i knew you had something in the wings and i was rewarded for my faith.

                    9/10 shitpost, instant classic.

              • @Apepollo11
                link
                English
                51 month ago

                I’m trying so hard not to reply to this nonsense…

              • @nomous
                link
                English
                41 month ago

                Do you believe people who are unresponsive and comatose for a long period should be kept alive despite the families wishes?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 month ago

            A fetus is objectively not fully formed. What do you think its doing in the womb for all those months, just hanging out? When abortions happen its just a bundle of cells that cant think, breathe, or live on its own.

            • ZeroOne
              link
              English
              -141 month ago

              Removed by mod

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                71 month ago

                Yeah a bunch of cells which have FULLY FORMED into a person. Something a fetus has in no way done.

              • moonlight
                link
                fedilink
                61 month ago

                A coma involves brain activity in a highly developed nervous system, often with a high chance of recovery.

                A fetus has a tiny, undeveloped nervous system, with no higher brain functions.

                These are not at all equivalent. One is a person, and the other is not.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 month ago

                Cancer

                Cancer is a bunch of cells. By your logic it is immoral to treat cancer. Cancer has human DNA. Cancer can also live independent of the human that spawned it.

                We should stop killing cancer too.

          • moonlight
            link
            fedilink
            71 month ago

            A tiny cluster of cells is not a “fully developed human”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            Then how come they can’t survive without leeching off a host? 80% of pregnancies spontaneously end in miscarriage. That doesn’t sound viable or fully developed to me. If it could survive outside the womb, you’d have a point. But it can’t, so you don’t.

            You know who was actually fully-developed? All the women who have died due to pregnancy complications thanks to draconic laws that take away their rights over their own bodies. I’ll hold you responsible for murdering them.

            • ZeroOne
              link
              English
              -161 month ago

              You clearly don’t know biology do you & are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ? BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

              • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020)
              • National Center for Health Statistics. (1999). Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates.
              • JAMA Network. (2020)

              I hold you responsible for the billions of deaths of unborn children, because of your stupidity & selfishness & inhumanity

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You clearly don’t know biology do you

                Says the person claiming a fetus is a fully developed human.

                are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ?

                Millions of people live in the jungles of the world. How many fetuses live outside wombs? Oh right, none. Because there’s a difference between having the skills to survive in the jungle, and being a fully developed human capable of independent biological survival.

                Have you ensured that every single one of your gametes resulted in a child? Then you’re a genocidal hypocrite.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

                Sure, if you only measure after 6 weeks.

                For women of reproductive age, losses between implantation and clinical recognition are approximately 10–25%. Loss from implantation to birth is approximately one third [39, 46, 48, 49].

                A recent re-analysis [39] of data from three studies [46, 48, 49] concluded that, in normal healthy women, 10–40% is a plausible range for pre-implantation embryo loss and overall pregnancy loss from fertilisation to birth is approximately 40–60%.

                https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443340/

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            No. A fully developed human would be post-pubescent. Until then you are either a fetus incapable of living outside your mother’s body, or a baby capable of independent life with some sort of care.

            Fetuses are NOT babies. Stop being obtuse.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        I assume you’ve adopted multiple unwanted children in the foster system including severely disabled ones, right?

        Since you think that “unborn children” shouldn’t be “killed,” you’ve got to be a major part of the solution.

        Tell me about your severely disabled kids you adopted from the foster system.

        • ZeroOne
          link
          English
          -431 month ago

          Removed by mod

          • @LePoisson
            link
            English
            181 month ago

            Oh fuck right off with that bullshit. Abortions are a medical procedure. Women have died because they can’t get them. Or should we just let fetuses that die in utero rot inside the womb and kill the poor woman who lost her baby through no fault of her own?

            That’s just one example off the top of my head.

            Nobody wants to or is killing children. That’s some hyperbolic bullshit.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              English
              81 month ago

              I just went through about 3 pages of their comment history.

              Therein lies a tale.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            English
            10
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            There are no orphanages in the U.S.

            Also, please name the 100% effective contraceptive.

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                English
                51 month ago

                Fair, but I would suggest that married couples who want more than one child should be allowed to choose to have as much sex as they want until they’re ready to have that next child. Of course, anti-abortion crusaders never think about the fact that it isn’t just those dirty sluts getting abortions. Married people have sex too.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  I was saying that abstinence and sterilization are not valid answers to this question as they are unreasonable to expect of people.

                  • @AlexanderTheDead
                    link
                    English
                    21 month ago

                    Also to add on, pretty sure sterilization is not a 100% success rate? Because of botched surgeries.

                    And with abstinence, we got Jesus, so…

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        Is it too late to abort you? Because you blatantly fail at having a basic grasp on reality.