• @Anticorp
    link
    English
    -41 month ago

    Vinyl is actually higher fidelity than CDs though. That’s not subjective, it’s scientifically verifiable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s not. The benefits are all hypothetical. In practical demonstrations, records have dramatically less dynamic range and more distortion. It’s not even a contest.

      • @Anticorp
        link
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        CDs have a digital sampling rate of 44.1 KHz. Vinyl is a continuous waveform as an analog medium, but if you were to digitize it, the equivalent sampling rate would be at 96 KHz or higher.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          Yes that’s the hypothesis.
          But in practice the distortion eliminates reliable reproduction at those frequencies, which humans can’t hear anyway.

        • Log in | Sign up
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          Yeah, but CDs don’t have static, aren’t affected by dust and there’s no hiss. In ideal conditions, vinyl is best, but I don’t live in a vacuum chamber.

          Back in the day my parents had a high quality turntable and sound system from a very well respected manufacturer, and we had strict rules on how you look after vinyl. The first generation CD player blew it away for sound fidelity.

          • @Anticorp
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            All you have to do is clean the record before playing it each time. It takes 20 seconds, and I enjoy the ritual.

        • threelonmusketeersM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          130 days ago

          CDs have a digital sampling rate of 44.1 KHz

          That’s because humans can’t hear frequencies above ~20 kHz. If humans could hear the difference, the sampling rate would be higher.