• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s not. The benefits are all hypothetical. In practical demonstrations, records have dramatically less dynamic range and more distortion. It’s not even a contest.

    • @Anticorp
      link
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      CDs have a digital sampling rate of 44.1 KHz. Vinyl is a continuous waveform as an analog medium, but if you were to digitize it, the equivalent sampling rate would be at 96 KHz or higher.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        Yes that’s the hypothesis.
        But in practice the distortion eliminates reliable reproduction at those frequencies, which humans can’t hear anyway.

      • Log in | Sign up
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Yeah, but CDs don’t have static, aren’t affected by dust and there’s no hiss. In ideal conditions, vinyl is best, but I don’t live in a vacuum chamber.

        Back in the day my parents had a high quality turntable and sound system from a very well respected manufacturer, and we had strict rules on how you look after vinyl. The first generation CD player blew it away for sound fidelity.

        • @Anticorp
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          All you have to do is clean the record before playing it each time. It takes 20 seconds, and I enjoy the ritual.

      • threelonmusketeersM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        CDs have a digital sampling rate of 44.1 KHz

        That’s because humans can’t hear frequencies above ~20 kHz. If humans could hear the difference, the sampling rate would be higher.