Summary
Rep. Annie Kuster, a 68-year-old Democrat from New Hampshire, retiring after 12 years in Congress, cites a desire to “set a better example” and create space for younger leaders.
Her decision comes amid growing public concern about aging politicians, with about a quarter of lawmakers over 70. Kuster’s successor will be Maggie Goodlander, 38.
Democrats are increasingly elevating younger leaders following setbacks in 2024, which some attribute to the perception of aging leadership, including President Biden’s controversial reelection bid.
Calls for age limits remain popular but face significant legislative hurdles.
By staying in office until they’re piles of dusty bones, while Dems “step down to set a good example.” The fallacy of “both sides” in any of this is thinking that by doing the right thing that the GOP will also follow suit.
Better?
You understand that stepping down doesn’t leave that seat vacant for the 119th Congress, right? That
there’ll be a special election to replace hershe’s being replaced by a 38-year-old Democrat? What the fuck does this 68-year-old staying there have to offer versus someone younger?How is someone younger automatically better?
What the fuck does my misunderstanding have to do with “both sides?” To answer your question, “No,” I didn’t realize that. Good - the only question will then be at reelection time when the replacement’s term ends. Unless, as you noted in your cross-out, there’s a special election.
“b0tH s!d3z”
Sometimes the answer is simpler than just making accusations.
I’m not the one who both-sides’d you. You’ll have to take that up with the other user.