• LostXOR
    link
    fedilink
    722 days ago

    I honestly don’t see a problem with that, as long as the woman gave her consent while she was of sound mind. Surrogate pregnancy is already a fairly common thing; this is just extending it to after one is brain-dead.

    Obviously if it’s done nonconsensually that’s an entirely different matter, and is a horrifying idea (imagine miraculously waking up from an 8 month coma only to find you’re pregnant with someone else’s child).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2722 days ago

      It’s an okay, morally ambiguous policy if you reduce pregnancy to a completely autonomous process like pooping. Pregnancy involves medical visit, and a lot of “how do you feel?” moments that a braindead person is incapable of doing.

      It’s the same dismissive thinking that suggests a robot can be a fry cook, what happens when an oddly shaped food item gets in a gear and it spills oil on the floor, who’s gonna clean it up?

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        922 days ago

        It’s the same dismissive thinking that suggests a robot can be a fry cook, what happens when an oddly shaped food item gets in a gear and it spills oil on the floor, who’s gonna clean it up?

        The cleansing power of fire, most likely.

      • LostXOR
        link
        fedilink
        622 days ago

        True, but you can’t always be sure someone is truly brain-dead.

    • baltakatei
      link
      fedilink
      322 days ago

      Two responses, channeling the defenseless future conscripts forced into this world literally to fill a “recruitment” quota:

      “Don’t build a person if you do not intend to be their ally.” — The Terraformers (2023)

      and

      “No! No! No! No! No!” — Team Four Star

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 days ago

      Well, if surrogacy is a fairly common thing, surely it has to be ethical. What a logical conclusion.