LG and Samsung have both announced their 2025 smart TVs at CES this weekend, and some of them will include access to Microsoft’s Copilot AI assistant. Both TV manufacturers are chasing the artificial intelligence hype train with dedicated AI sections on their smart TVs that include a shortcut to a Copilot web app.

LG is adding an entire AI section to its TVs and rebranding its remote to “AI Remote,” in an effort to sell consumers on the promise of large language models. While it’s not clear exactly how Copilot works on LG’s latest TVs, the company describes access to Copilot as a way to allow users to “efficiently find and organize complex information using contextual cues.”

LG hasn’t demonstrated its Copilot integration just yet, but it has shown off its own AI Chatbot that’s part of its TVs. It appears Copilot will be surfaced when LG TV users want to search for more information on a particular subject.

Samsung also has its own Vision AI brand for its AI-powered TV features this year, which include AI upscaling, Auto HDR Remastering, and Adaptive Sound Pro. There’s also a new AI button on the remote to access AI features like recognizing food on a screen or AI home security features that analyze video feeds from smart cameras.

Microsoft’s Copilot will be part of this Vision AI section. “In collaboration with Microsoft, Samsung announced the new Smart TVs and Smart Monitors featuring Microsoft Copilot,” says Samsung in a press release. “This partnership will enable users to explore a wide range of Copilot services, including personalized content recommendations.”

I asked Samsung for more information or images of Copilot in action, but the company doesn’t have anything more to share right now. I’ve also asked LG and Microsoft for more information about Copilot on TVs and neither company has responded in time for publication. Without any indication of exactly how Copilot works on these TVs, I’m going to chalk this one up as a gimmicky feature that LG, Samsung, and Microsoft clearly aren’t ready to demo yet.

  • @GroundedGator
    link
    English
    722 days ago

    Miss the days when you could buy a dumb TV and add the tech you wanted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          292 days ago

          Quite the opposite, actually. The “smart” part gives you huge discounts because they expect to make it back on the data they collect.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 days ago

            I can see the logic, but is actually cheaper or the “dumb TV” is just overpriced? They still need to add a processor and shitty computer parts to the TV to have the smart thingy

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              92 days ago

              is actually cheaper or the “dumb TV” is just overpriced?

              I don’t know what that means. I don’t know how old you are or where you are getting your perspective from but before TVs were “smart” they cost waaaay more. Back in like 2012 I paid ~$2k for a 50" plasma TV. Still have the receipt.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 days ago

                TV is cheaper now, if you compare it to when the technology for plasma TV, ultra HD and so on first started, production got a lot better and cheaper. What I’m asking is: is the TV part of the “smart TV” cheap and they’re making us pay more for it by adding the smart part, or is the logic that they’re giving a discount because they can make the extra money with the data.

                Because it could start with paying the extra cost with the data, but now it’s the norm and they can charge more for it and still make more money selling data.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  or is the logic that they’re giving a discount because they can make the extra money with the data.

                  Yes that is what I said.

                  but now it’s the norm and they can charge more for it and still make more money selling data.

                  They still have to compete with all the other TV manufacturers.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    32 days ago

                    They still have to compete with all the other TV manufacturers.

                    The only big manufacturer that I can remember that I never saw making smart TVs is Fujitsu and I don’t even know if they are still making TVs

            • @acosmichippo
              link
              English
              32 days ago

              the parts are mostly already there anyway for image processing, perhaps upgraded slightly. I doubt it’s a significant cost.

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          English
          52 days ago

          The smart part of a large TV is cheap. Also why they’re slow af. The price is dominated by the LCD module.

        • @ZILtoid1991
          link
          English
          12 days ago

          Every time I asked for a high-quality, non-RGB/backlight, yet affordable keyboard, people never understood that I’d still pay for it.

        • @ikidd
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This scares me if I have to buy a new one, because I’d completely forgotten my TV has smart functions, I haven’t seen a trace of it for years with a Pi hooked up on the HDMI. It just starts up to the last input it was on. Heck, I turn it on with Home Assistant Voice automation that sends a CEC command to it over that HDMI. I haven’t even used the remote in months.

        • @aesthelete
          link
          English
          22 days ago

          There’s usually a way to get it to jump to the last input.

          This news is reminding me that I need to unplug my TV from the Internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Nothing is stopping them from adding the smart crap to things over HDMI inputs. If it doesn’t have it at launch, I recommend blocking it from getting updates so you don’t get “upgraded” later.

      • @GroundedGator
        link
        English
        72 days ago

        Yes they do and I do add my own tech but my experience with some of these devices has not been great.

        I have LG TVs which I connected to the network and have been updated over the years to have really bad UX and are now polluted with ads.

        I had an LG sound bar that was great for a while until it completely stopped working. Powers on, all functions seem to work, just no sound. Originally it worked as a Chromecast device too, but they stopped doing updates and Google stopped working with the old API.

        My fear is that eventually there will be an update that bricks a device. Now I’ve taken them off the network, but how long before we have TVs that require Internet to even function.

        These smart TVs have a lot more hardware and software than they need which means a lot more to break.