• @Skullgrid
    link
    53
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    gender reveal parties, but a pendant shows up and explains it’s meant to be a sex reveal party, but due to the more risque use of the word sex, and the ambigious uses of the word gender, communication about the motive of such things are difficult, and a feeding ground for pendants, people who have been marginalised, and oppressors.

    I also don’t know where I’m going with this. I’m not sure what my next task should be and I’m letting my mind percolate.

      • @Skullgrid
        link
        1217 hours ago

        oxford deez nuts.

        fixed it anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2118 hours ago

      Was it an opal pendant, or perhaps a cameo?

      Also, I prefer French press over percolate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1018 hours ago

      Ambiguous usage of the word is one of the reasons oppressors have such outdated and undereducated views. The less ambiguity the easier it can be explained to the common folk.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        717 hours ago

        The fun bit is that the word gender was pulled from linguistics into sociology exactly to try to make a less ambiguous situation.

        It literally went "what if we talked about people having gender like the French talk about objects?” Much like people, a table is feminine in French regardless of if it has a penis or not.

        Later, people decided to use gender as a synonym for sex and complain about using the word gender in a way that’s ambiguous with sex.

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      519 hours ago

      Who invited the streaker to the gender reveal party?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        717 hours ago

        Me. The last one was boring. And the one before that started a huge fire. Figured nudity was safer.