• @TrickDacy
    link
    English
    811 hours ago

    Is the point of mentioning Oppenheimer to get people not to buy it or what?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1711 hours ago

      Oppenheimer has been out for a long time. It is what James Woods is most known for. Boycotting will not have much effect anymore. Maybe his next work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 hours ago

        It is what James Woods is most known for.

        And Matt Damon is best known for Thor: Love and Thunder?

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          35 minutes ago

          Sean Connery, best known for the animated film Sir Billi

          Michael J. Fox, best known for the 2023 movie “Still”

          Jaleel White best known for the game show “Flip Side”

          I can do this all day.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        3611 hours ago

        Oppenheimer has been out for a long time.

        If a bit over a year is a “long time” then I’m a lot older than you lol.

        It is what James Woods is most known for

        uh, whhhat? that is certainly not true. I’ve known of him for like 20 years as a (shitty) actor and had no clue he was involved with Oppenheimer whatsoever, despite seeing that movie in the theater. From IMBD:

        In some ways, the executive producer isn’t super involved anyhow. My understanding is that they just drum up money and try to persuade suits that a picture should be made. I’m sure he got paid 100 times his worth though…

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            220 minutes ago

            I am guessing you’re younger than me :)

            The Virgin Suicides, for example, was pretty popular and well known to me and my circle.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1010 hours ago

          I doubt any of those movies are currently more known than Oppenheimer. The listed movies have James Woods participating as an actor. Whereas with Oppenheimer, James was bankrolling it. Executive producers can have more influence than producers. It depends whether they decide to be hands-on or only see the movie as an investment.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 hours ago

            Oppenheimer may be well known, but I don’t know if anybody had any idea it was produced by James Woods. He’s not known for that movie by any stretch.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            1310 hours ago

            You can see right there in the IMDB screenshot they use the same language you did (“known for”). I think IMDB has their finger on the pulse of how people talk about entertainment. Many people in the movie industry are most known for things from years ago but still work frequently. Like would you say Christopher Lloyd is most known for whatever semi-popular thing from the last couple of years he had a role in, or Back to the Future?

            You are right that EP’s vary in involvement, but even if I had known he was EP in that film, I still would’ve had the same question I originally asked.

            • @finitebanjo
              link
              English
              33 hours ago

              Anybody who thinks Christopher Loyd’s legacy is from The Mandelorian needs an iPadless TimeOut.