• Flying Squid
    link
    84
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I really don’t know how they don’t understand the very simple concept that you can’t force someone into a contract.

    But it was nice of him to not charge a fee to keep people updated, I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        231 month ago

        When you understand something so well, that you now overstand it, to the point it’s taking up too much brain real estate.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          71 month ago

          If you have not watched Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, you’ll enjoy it.

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      181 month ago

      But the gubment forced us into a contract of indentured servitude under the social security gold standard emancipation proclamation​!

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s all based on the articles of confederation or wtv where it was a bit more free and wild, people had these kinds of rules and contracts between them. Nothing like this of course.

      Basically they think an old government piece of paper that has wording they prefer outweighs the government piece of paper they don’t. (The one they don’t have to pay for, but still get alll the benefits).

    • @Roopappy
      link
      21 month ago

      “By your performance, we mutally agree”. “It is now effective due to their performance.”

      Is “performance” some kind of magic word? On the surface, and also under the surface, this doesn’t make any sense.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        11 month ago

        It’s all magic words with SovCits.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        111 month ago

        No, you still have to agree to the ToS. They can’t force you. All they can do is say that you cannot access the software or service if you don’t agree to it. No one can force you to agree to a contract. That’s just not how contract law works.