Summary

Episcopal Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde refused to apologize after delivering a sermon at the National Cathedral that criticized Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ and immigration policies, calling for compassion and mercy for marginalized groups.

Trump responded by attacking Budde on Truth Social, labeling her a “Radical Left hard line Trump hater.”

Budde, known for prior criticism of Trump, said she stands by her message and has received both support and threats.

She emphasized the need for dignity and respect in public discourse to counter the “culture of contempt.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1727 hours ago

    You heard it here first folks. Jesus was of the radical left.

    Right wingers have lost their goddamn minds.

    • @MothmanDelorian
      link
      264 hours ago

      Jesus told you that if you saw a guy who needs clothes and you have clothes you aren’t wearing you should give that guy some clothes. This was a strong inspiration for a major philosophy that for some reason many “Christians” hate called Marxism

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1006 hours ago

      Unironically, Jesus was radical left in many ways. Many Christians do not like to confront those aspects of the bible.

      Let criminals into your home. Give them shelter and food. Give all of your money to charity. If someone harms you, turn the other cheek. Feed the poor before yourself. Brutally whip greedy wealthy people. Those are just some fun examples.

      • @aesthelete
        link
        194 hours ago

        If someone harms you, turn the other cheek.

        This is a bit of an aside, but the “turn the other cheek” passage from the bible is interpreted in multiple ways. My favorite is:

        The scholar Walter Wink, in his book Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination, interprets the passage as ways to subvert the power structures of the time.[3] At the time of Jesus, says Wink, striking backhand a person deemed to be of lower socioeconomic class was a means of asserting authority and dominance. If the persecuted person “turned the other cheek,” the discipliner was faced with a dilemma: the left hand was used for unclean purposes, so a back-hand strike on the opposite cheek would not be performed. An alternative would be a slap with the open hand as a challenge or to punch the person, but this was seen as a statement of equality. Thus, by turning the other cheek, the persecuted was demanding equality.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_the_other_cheek

        • @Zahille7
          link
          118 minutes ago

          So it’s kind of like a pre-medieval gentlemanly way of saying “let’s take this outside”?

      • @foofiepie
        link
        94 hours ago

        “And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.” ‭‭Acts‬ ‭2‬:‭44‬-‭47‬ ‭ESV‬‬

        Sounds pretty radically left to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 hours ago

          And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need.

          Huh, sounds vaguely familiar… Something like, “from each, according to their ability, to which according to their need”?

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        Except for brutally whipping greedy people, I don’t think any of that is radical at all.

      • @Xanthobilly
        link
        175 hours ago

        It’s what MLK did so well, and honestly, this is the first step to breaking the GOPs monopoly on religion and the Southern Strategy.

      • @MothmanDelorian
        link
        44 hours ago

        where does Jesus say to feed the poor before yourself?

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        136 hours ago

        Or if he returned, as their legend portends.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 hours ago

          They see Trump as the Second Coming, and wear his symbol on their foreheads, blinding themselves to the truth that he’s the antiChrist.

        • Zloubida
          link
          0
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Unmeekness is not necessarily aggressive (Matthew 5:5 is about humility, not docility).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      86 hours ago

      Attacking traders, saying that you should share your food because you’ll get it back several times over, rebelling against autocratic rulers, solidarity and meeting the poor and marginalised at eye level

      Definitely extreme left.

      And does anyone remember the time when his affinity group resisted Jesus’ imprisonment by the security authorities by cutting off one of the officers’ ears? I have my doubts that it happened that way because the guy was seen with both ears several times afterwards, but the police legionnaires would never invent details to make the leftists look worse.

      This shows that the movement surrounding the carpenter “Jesus” is obviously ready for violence. Also, numerous talks by followers of this group about a “Kingdom of God” (we suspect this is dog whispering for “dictatorship of the proletariat” as some leftists say they are “their own god”). In addition, influential members of this movement openly spoke of overthrowing the existing order. Although these plans were thwarted by “Jesus”, his tolerance towards potential ideological perpetrators of violence suggests that he does not rule out a violent overthrow.

      The group should be categorised as left-wing extremist and left-wing terrorist and should be smashed immediately.