• @flossdaily
    link
    English
    381 year ago

    Fascism is an ideology that rewards people for being the worst version of themselves.

    With every evil act they perform they feel better about themselves. These people are just getting started.

    • Matt Shatt
      link
      English
      -14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

        • Matt Shatt
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          Yeah my post wasn’t pointed at anybody here. Just made me think of all the instances where each side calls the other fascist. I think most of us here realize who the real fascists are…

          • @SpaceNoodle
            link
            English
            111 year ago

            Well, at best only half the people actually know what the word actually means.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        On the other hand, one side is adopting fascist methods and ideology while the other side are democrats. What Republicans are doing is using dilution language, and you’ve fallen for it .

      • Meldroc
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Matt Shatt
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Could you expand on that? I want to be clear that this isn’t a bOtH sIdEs argument I’m making here. I’m pointing out that “both sides” call each other the same thing but it’s clear to me that one side really is engaging in fascist acts while the other isn’t. The opposite of the bOtH sIdEs argument really…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -191 year ago

        It’s the horseshoe theory of politics. Both far ends of the spectrum have more in common with each other (being basically fascists) than they really have differences (different core issues they rally their fascism around).

        Both only really look at the other’s extreme, and see fascism, but aren’t self aware enough to see their own. Or they dismiss their own as only the extremists, not realizing how this may apply to the other side.

        • @shortgiraffe
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Being fascist on the right is not extreme. Look at the laws they’re passing. That is absolutely not the case for the left.

        • @drenchtoast
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          Far from not knowing what fascism means, I suspect you don’t even know what left/right means. Unless you’re just doing a horseshoe theory bit.

          This could be fun though.

          Please compare and contrast the distinguishing features of “left fascism” vs “right fascism.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I was really just doing a horseshoe theory bit. I’m willing to accept the downvotes since I didn’t feel like stating my personal thoughts on the current political situation added to the intent of that comment.

            Edit: thanks for editing your comment after I replied. Though maybe it was just a delay in federating the edit. The only bit of “both sides” that I’ll say is that some people on both sides have attempted to silence nonviolent opinions. This really isn’t saying much, considering that in any large discourse some idiots will always do this on every side. One side is actually banning books and trying to rewrite history in blatantly false ways.

            • @drenchtoast
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Well, thanks for owning up, but you know there are ppl who’ll read that and go “yeah those goddamn fascist lefties” without a second thought. Please don’t reinforce that.

              As for violence… I think it’s worth considering when it would be justified, or even necessary as self-defense. As you say, one side is clearly the aggressor here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I understand where you’re coming from on the first part, but I’m not sure how I feel about silencing anything that’s true as a strategy in… Anything. I get how it helps, and I’m not saying I don’t keep quiet on little things throughout life, but ideally I’d like to live in a world where wrongs are always acknowledged. The problem is getting people to understand the relative prevalence and weights of those wrongs in reality.

                I struggle with my opinion on violent action all the time. A lot of the time I see nonviolent protest as increasingly irrelevant in the modern world. But I also worry about what society will be if we accept various levels of violence. I know it’s a slippery slope argument, but justifying anything can honestly be really easy, and any line we draw can be argued to be arbitrary. Currently I think rhetoric that’s inciting violence is something I’ll generally frown upon, and I lean towards accepting that that’s outside of a societally good right to free speech.