I could see people going either way on that. I think it’s safe to say few people want to see that and the vast majority don’t want to see it more than once.
it is a public figure AND a current news story.
true
Imo, it seems like poor judgement.
Probably, but it’s also pretty understandable. Generally how that kind of stuff is handled in media is to report on it, link to it and tell people what’s in the link, let them decide.
Its not explicit and it is a public figure AND a current news story. Imo, it seems like poor judgement.
Which is probably why the decision was reverted.
I could see people going either way on that. I think it’s safe to say few people want to see that and the vast majority don’t want to see it more than once.
true
Probably, but it’s also pretty understandable. Generally how that kind of stuff is handled in media is to report on it, link to it and tell people what’s in the link, let them decide.