Summary

Donald Trump’s name appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s recently released flight logs seven times, including flights in 1993 and 1994, some with his then-wife Marla Maples and daughter Tiffany.

The documents were released by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who stated this was the first phase of disclosures regarding Epstein’s network.

Bondi requested additional FBI records on Epstein, citing thousands of undisclosed pages.

Epstein, who died in 2019, had connections to Trump, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew, though no wrongdoing by Trump has been alleged.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24010 hours ago

    Let’s be honest: If Epstein was still alive and in prison, he would get a pardon from Trump

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      6710 hours ago

      Tbh Trump might have been the one who killed him. Either that or a UK Prince.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4510 hours ago

        They didn’t have to kill him, it doesn’t have to be a conspiracy. Barr’s DOJ allowed a man in a VERY high profile case that should have been on increased watch commit suicide on the eve of his bombshell testimony and going away forever. They allowed him to take his own out.

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          769 hours ago

          The conspiracy was the missing footage, not the method of death. It was intentionally covered up.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          449 hours ago

          Thats just it, he already was on 24 hour surveillance and suicide watch.

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          48 hours ago

          Yeah, something that seems to be getting glossed over because the conspiracy is more entertaining. He was either murdered or allowed to kill himself. Both are equally bad.

            • @Duamerthrax
              link
              15 hours ago

              What’s the difference? Both would have resulted in the death of a man and a miscarriage of justice? Both would be caused by a direct decision.

              • @ReluctantMuskrat
                link
                55 hours ago

                Because in one case Epstein decides himself to be dead. In the other Epstein doesn’t want to be dead but is murdered.

                • @Duamerthrax
                  link
                  14 hours ago

                  I’m not really too concerned with Epstein’s agency in all this.

                  • @ReluctantMuskrat
                    link
                    14 hours ago

                    I’m not concerned for Epstein at all. A murderer murdering a pedophile, and likely doing so as part of a conspiracy to protect other pedophiles, is still much worse than someone deciding to look the other way while Epstein offs himself.

                • @notsoshaihulud
                  link
                  04 hours ago

                  Because in one case Epstein decides himself to be dead.

                  I guess the difference is consent. Something his victims didn’t get to provide either.

                  • @ReluctantMuskrat
                    link
                    24 hours ago

                    I honestly am not concerned about Epstein’s consent.

                    A murderer murdering a pedophile, and likely doing so as part of a conspiracy to protect other pedophiles, is much worse than someone deciding to look the other way while Epstein offs himself.

                    Epstein being dead is disappointing either way, but only because we didn’t get more information from him.

        • TheLowestStone
          link
          79 hours ago

          In that situation, giving him the means and opportunity is the same things as killing him yourself.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            -129 hours ago

            Except that’s not how words work

            • TheLowestStone
              link
              89 hours ago

              Yes, it is. Knowingly handing a suicidal person a loaded gun and walking away is murdering them.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                08 hours ago

                You can look at it that way and make an argument, but in this case it’s just a shortcut to implying a conspiracy theory is true that still remains a theory.

                I will never understand why people want to be sure about things they cannot know.

                • TheLowestStone
                  link
                  46 hours ago

                  This isn’t some Q-anon or fakr moon landing conspiracy bullshit. This was a wealthy pedophile on suicide watch in prison who just so happened to have the opportunity to kill himself hours before he would have given testimony implicating dozens of elites. Sure, it’s possible that was not intentional but you can’t deny that it is suspicious.

                  Also, you really shouldn’t put words in other people’s mouths. I said giving him the opportunity intentionally would be the same as killing him. I never said that definitely happened. I think is extremely likely but there’s no way I could be sure.

                  • @TrickDacy
                    link
                    -26 hours ago

                    I never denied it was suspicious. Just find it so annoying that people cannot stop with that. Until there’s hard evidence of it, it’s speculation. Doesn’t even matter if it’s likely true. Repeating it over and over makes it true for some people but I won’t be one of them.