Summary

In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court weakened the Clean Water Act by limiting the EPA’s authority to issue generic water quality standards.

The majority, led by Justice Alito, ruled that the EPA must impose specific pollutant limits instead of broad, “end result” requirements. The city of San Francisco prevailed, challenging the EPA’s narrative-based permits for sewage discharges.

Dissenters, led by Justice Barrett, argued the law authorizes stronger measures to protect water supplies.

The case marks the first significant Clean Water Act challenge since Chevron deference was overturned in 2024.

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    1222 hours ago

    Something something “drain the swamp”.

    The joke about Republicans letting the likes of Bronzo the Clown take a shit in their mouth if they thought a liberal would have to smell it now became very close to literally true.

    “Not having to eat actual shit from our water supply is just a lot of woke bullshit!” -magamorons, probably

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      418 hours ago

      Why don’t we just drain the swamp right into the drinking water supplies of schools? It’s a win-win-win!