Summary

In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court weakened the Clean Water Act by limiting the EPA’s authority to issue generic water quality standards.

The majority, led by Justice Alito, ruled that the EPA must impose specific pollutant limits instead of broad, “end result” requirements. The city of San Francisco prevailed, challenging the EPA’s narrative-based permits for sewage discharges.

Dissenters, led by Justice Barrett, argued the law authorizes stronger measures to protect water supplies.

The case marks the first significant Clean Water Act challenge since Chevron deference was overturned in 2024.

  • Wren
    shield
    M
    link
    35 hours ago

    This cornucopia of corruption is unprecedented. It seems we’re seeing all of his buyers receiving their benefits in real time.

  • @Maggoty
    link
    37 hours ago

    Yes California has one Sewage Crisis. But what about Second Sewage Crisis?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 hours ago

    A 5-4 decision that weakens water protections is a win for polluters, not the public.

    🐱

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      06 hours ago

      It’s not a win for the polluters. They’re polluting their own water.

      “Public” means everybody, it’s not the other team that goes with “private”. It’s everybody.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 hours ago

        Nice try, but polluters don’t see ‘everybody’—just dollar signs and disposable ecosystems.

        🐱🐱

  • FundMECFS
    link
    fedilink
    38 hours ago

    Its ridiculous when the courts are so clearly partisan. What is the point of the justice system anymore?

    • Makhno
      link
      37 hours ago

      This is a completely separate issue…?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 hours ago

        It is, however you’d think such a publicized event would have stressed the importance of clean water to anyone that heard about it. Even the people who are racist should understand why they should want their water to be clean.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    612 hours ago

    I thought San Francisco were supposed to be good guys? Why are they pulling the EPA in front of the Supreme Court? Just to save some money on their infrastructure at the cost of the public?

    • @Maggoty
      link
      47 hours ago

      San Francisco has been shifting conservative for a while. A bunch of tech millionaires want to turn it into a futuristic dystopia.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 hours ago

      The city government of San Francisco is fucking broke because they built their entire budget and town around shitty tech startup open offices and nobody ever wanted that so now it all sits empty and decaying.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17 hours ago

      Should have seen what they did to their homeless as soon as they were legally allowed to. When you travel far enough, extreme Left and Right both seem to be looping around and into the anus of Authoritarianism.

      • @bitjunkie
        link
        26 hours ago

        Implying that “extreme left” in any way applies to establishment Democrats.

  • @Raiderkev
    link
    2317 hours ago

    “Let them drink shit.”

    • Clarence Thomas probably
  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1215 hours ago

    The EPA 100% has a spreadsheet showing which pollutants lead up to those “end results”. Hopefully a swath of specific limitations comes out very, very, quickly.

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    1221 hours ago

    Something something “drain the swamp”.

    The joke about Republicans letting the likes of Bronzo the Clown take a shit in their mouth if they thought a liberal would have to smell it now became very close to literally true.

    “Not having to eat actual shit from our water supply is just a lot of woke bullshit!” -magamorons, probably

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      418 hours ago

      Why don’t we just drain the swamp right into the drinking water supplies of schools? It’s a win-win-win!

  • teft
    link
    160
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Shithole country. Literally.

    • @lolrightythen
      link
      431 day ago

      Its not as if this saves money. It just shifts the expense. Purified water treatment plants are going to have to compensate for increasingly contaminated source water. I’d wager this will negatively impact nitrification. Just pollution for no societal gain. Greed, I assume.

      Ugh. I think I’ve hit my limit for bad news today. Be well, all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You’re from the UK, yes? The issue here is combined sewers; these produce overflow during periods of heavy rainfall. They’re a characteristic of older cities. You guys in the UK, with older cities, have considerably more of these than does the US, especially the western US, which are mostly newer cities built after separate sewers became the norm.

      I don’t know how you’d measure public views on the matter.

      kagis

      These guys are UK-based and studying public opinion on the matter:

      https://www.jacobs.com/newsroom/thought-leadership/combined-sewer-overflows-uk-what-can-we-learn-other-countries

      In our review, we found that CSOs in the U.K. do receive a higher level of public attention and are more heavily scrutinized than in European Union (EU) countries, while the U.S. is further ahead in terms of public awareness and stakeholder involvement.

  • venotic
    link
    fedilink
    441 day ago

    Let’s bring back lead paint.

    Let’s bring back coal refineries in full swing.

    Let’s bring back rulings against having warning labels.

    Let’s just go all the fucking way in how we can truly bastardize this country even further.

    • @Mog_fanatic
      link
      101 day ago

      FINALLY! God it feels like I’ve been saying it forever but OUR WATER IS TOO CLEAN! Cannot tell you how much I miss sewage and dead animals in my water. Puts hair on your chest! Kids these days barely know what it’s like to get a little cholera or typhoid. By the time I was six I had e coli twice, and salmonella. Wouldn’t trade it for the world. MAGA!!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 hours ago

        there’s prison slavery happening all over the country. “fun” fact, school districts are encouraged to purchase furniture made by incarcerated people, and can even hire them to do maintenance type jobs (like painting etc).

        shit is already fucked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What do you need clean water for? You can purchase it from Nestle anyway as part of your essentials subscription.

  • @Pacattack57
    link
    121 day ago

    If the EPA are the experts wouldn’t it make sense they should set specific requirements for water safety? What am I missing here?

    • @Maggoty
      link
      1
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You’re missing that SCOTUS has taken the mask off and is complicit in the destruction of the regulations for the benefit of their elite donors. (Yes I know they don’t campaign, yes I know what I said. Watch John Oliver talk about RV’s if you need more context.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    301 day ago

    Great, so now asshole industrialists can pollute with whatever new-fangled chemicals they want, and if it’s not on the blacklist (good luck navigating the red tape to add to that list btw), they are free of liability and the public can get sick. Wonderful.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      27 hours ago

      Oh look we changed the formula for Horrible Death Liquid tm by one molocule. Anyways we’ll just throw that in the reservoir behind the elementary school, what could go wrong?